Literature DB >> 19453724

Density dependence and cooperation: theory and a test with bacteria.

Adin Ross-Gillespie1, Andy Gardner, Angus Buckling, Stuart A West, Ashleigh S Griffin.   

Abstract

Although cooperative systems can persist in nature despite the potential for exploitation by noncooperators, it is often observed that small changes in population demography can tip the balance of selective forces for or against cooperation. Here we consider the role of population density in the context of microbial cooperation. First, we account for conflicting results from recent studies by demonstrating theoretically that: (1) for public goods cooperation, higher densities are relatively unfavorable for cooperation; (2) in contrast, for self-restraint-type cooperation, higher densities can be either favorable or unfavorable for cooperation, depending on the details of the system. We then test our predictions concerning public goods cooperation using strains of the pathogenic bacterium Pseudomonas aeruginosa that produce variable levels of a public good-iron-scavenging siderophore molecules. As predicted, we found that the relative fitness of cheats (under-producers) was greatest at higher population densities. Furthermore, as assumed by theory, we show that this occurs because cheats are better able to exploit the cooperative siderophore production of other cells when they are physically closer to them.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19453724     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2009.00723.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  50 in total

1.  Microbial secretor-cheater dynamics.

Authors:  Steven A Frank
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Consequences of fluctuating group size for the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Ake Brännström; Thilo Gross; Bernd Blasius; Ulf Dieckmann
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Molecular and regulatory properties of a public good shape the evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  Rolf Kümmerli; Sam P Brown
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Cooperation, clumping and the evolution of multicellularity.

Authors:  Jay M Biernaskie; Stuart A West
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  A model of extracellular enzymes in free-living microbes: which strategy pays off?

Authors:  Sachia J Traving; Uffe H Thygesen; Lasse Riemann; Colin A Stedmon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Kin selection in den sharing develops under limited availability of tree hollows for a forest marsupial.

Authors:  Sam C Banks; David B Lindenmayer; Lachlan McBurney; David Blair; Emma J Knight; Michaela D J Blyton
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations.

Authors:  Sophie E Darch; Stuart A West; Klaus Winzer; Stephen P Diggle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Negative regulation of bacterial quorum sensing tunes public goods cooperation.

Authors:  Rashmi Gupta; Martin Schuster
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 10.302

9.  Cell-cell contacts confine public goods diffusion inside Pseudomonas aeruginosa clonal microcolonies.

Authors:  Thomas Julou; Thierry Mora; Laurent Guillon; Vincent Croquette; Isabelle J Schalk; David Bensimon; Nicolas Desprat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Bacterial Quorum Sensing Stabilizes Cooperation by Optimizing Growth Strategies.

Authors:  Eric L Bruger; Christopher M Waters
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.