AIM: Regular dental flossing has been widely recommended to prevent periodontal diseases. Nevertheless, compliance is below a desirable level. This study evaluates the effects of a brief behavioural intervention on dental flossing and determines whether the effects of such an intervention are stronger in a specific subgroup of individuals (those intending to floss regularly=implemental mindset). MATERIALS AND METHOD:Behavioural intervention (planning when, where and how to floss) trial was conducting with 194 participants assigned to an intervention or a control group by a random time schedule; the primary outcome was validated self-report of flossing behaviour. Follow-up data were collected 2 and 8 weeks post-intervention. RESULTS: Individuals receiving the planning intervention significantly outperformed those in the control condition at both the 2- and the 8-week follow-up (4.24 times flossing/week versus 3.9 at 2 weeks; 4.02 versus 2.98 at 8 weeks). Intervention effects were stronger in individuals in the implemental mindset. Dropout rates were higher for participants who received the planning intervention but were not in the implemental mindset. CONCLUSION: Planning interventions are an economic and effective way to change oral self-care behaviour, and are more effective in individuals in an implemental mindset.
RCT Entities:
AIM: Regular dental flossing has been widely recommended to prevent periodontal diseases. Nevertheless, compliance is below a desirable level. This study evaluates the effects of a brief behavioural intervention on dental flossing and determines whether the effects of such an intervention are stronger in a specific subgroup of individuals (those intending to floss regularly=implemental mindset). MATERIALS AND METHOD: Behavioural intervention (planning when, where and how to floss) trial was conducting with 194 participants assigned to an intervention or a control group by a random time schedule; the primary outcome was validated self-report of flossing behaviour. Follow-up data were collected 2 and 8 weeks post-intervention. RESULTS: Individuals receiving the planning intervention significantly outperformed those in the control condition at both the 2- and the 8-week follow-up (4.24 times flossing/week versus 3.9 at 2 weeks; 4.02 versus 2.98 at 8 weeks). Intervention effects were stronger in individuals in the implemental mindset. Dropout rates were higher for participants who received the planning intervention but were not in the implemental mindset. CONCLUSION: Planning interventions are an economic and effective way to change oral self-care behaviour, and are more effective in individuals in an implemental mindset.
Authors: J Mattos-Silveira; B B Matos-Lima; T A Oliveira; K Jarroug; R V Rego; A Reyes; F R Ferreira; J C Imparato; M M Braga Journal: Eur Arch Paediatr Dent Date: 2017-01-30
Authors: Ananda B Londero; Ana Paula P Reiniger; Rodrigo C R Tavares; Ciandra M Ferreira; Ulf M E Wikesjö; Karla Z Kantorski; Carlos Heitor Cunha Moreira Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 3.606
Authors: Dario Sambunjak; Jason W Nickerson; Tina Poklepovic Pericic; Trevor M Johnson; Pauline Imai; Peter Tugwell; Helen V Worthington Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2019-04-23
Authors: Francesca A Soldani; Thomas Lamont; Kate Jones; Linda Young; Tanya Walsh; Rizwana Lala; Janet E Clarkson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2018-10-31