Literature DB >> 19453538

Comprehensive Australasian multicentre dosimetric intercomparison: issues, logistics and recommendations.

M A Ebert1, K M Harrison, D Cornes, S J Howlett, D J Joseph, T Kron, C S Hamilton, J W Denham.   

Abstract

The present paper describes the logistics of the 2004-2008 Australasian Level III Dosimetry Intercomparison. Dosimetric intercomparisons (or 'audits') can be used in radiotherapy to evaluate the accuracy and quality of radiation delivery. An intercomparison was undertaken in New Zealand and Australia to evaluate the feasibility and logistics of ongoing dosimetric intercomparisons that evaluate all steps in the radiotherapy treatment process, known as a 'Level III' intercomparison. The study commenced in 2002 with the establishment of a study team, definition of the study protocol, acquisition of appropriate equipment and recruitment of participating radiotherapy centres. Measurements were undertaken between October 2004 and March 2008, and included collation of data on time, costs and logistics of the study. Forty independent Australian and New Zealand radiotherapy centres agreed to participate. Measurement visits were made to 37 of these centres. Data is presented on the costs of the study and the level of support required. The study involved the participation of 16 staff at the study centre who invested over 4000 hours in the study, and of over 200 professionals at participating centres. Recommendations are provided for future phantom-based intercomparisons. It is hoped that the present paper will be of benefit to any centres or groups contemplating similar activities by identifying the processes involved in establishing the study, the potential hazards and pitfalls, and expected resource requirements.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19453538     DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02047.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1754-9477            Impact factor:   1.735


  5 in total

1.  An overview of the medical-physics-related verification system for radiotherapy multicenter clinical trials by the Medical Physics Working Group in the Japan Clinical Oncology Group-Radiation Therapy Study Group.

Authors:  Teiji Nishio; Mitsuhiro Nakamura; Hiroyuki Okamoto; Satoshi Kito; Toshiyuki Minemura; Shuichi Ozawa; Yu Kumazaki; Masayori Ishikawa; Naoki Tohyama; Masahiko Kurooka; Takeo Nakashima; Hidetoshi Shimizu; Ryusuke Suzuki; Satoshi Ishikura; Yasumasa Nishimura
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  The Australian Clinical Dosimetry Service: a commentary on the first 18 months.

Authors:  Ivan Williams; John Kenny; Jessica Lye; Joerg Lehmann; Leon Dunn; Tomas Kron
Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 1.430

Review 3.  Novel methodologies for dosimetry audits: Adapting to advanced radiotherapy techniques.

Authors:  Marlies Pasler; Victor Hernandez; Núria Jornet; Catharine H Clark
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-03-19

4.  Dosimetric end-to-end tests in a national audit of 3D conformal radiotherapy.

Authors:  Joerg Lehmann; Andrew Alves; Leon Dunn; Maddison Shaw; John Kenny; Stephanie Keehan; Jeremy Supple; Francis Gibbons; Sophie Manktelow; Chris Oliver; Tomas Kron; Ivan Williams; Jessica Lye
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-24

5.  Regional cancer centre demonstrates voluntary conformity with the national Radiation Oncology Practice Standards.

Authors:  Stephen Manley; Andrew Last; Kenneth Fu; Stuart Greenham; Andrew Kovendy; Thomas P Shakespeare
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2015-04-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.