Literature DB >> 19453534

Dosimetric comparison of intensity modulated radiotherapy techniques and standard wedged tangents for whole breast radiotherapy.

Andrew Fong1, Regina Bromley, Mardi Beat, Din Vien, Jude Dineley, Graeme Morgan.   

Abstract

Prior to introducing intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for whole breast radiotherapy (WBRT) into our department we undertook a comparison of the dose parameters of several IMRT techniques and standard wedged tangents (SWT). Our aim was to improve the dose distribution to the breast and to decrease the dose to organs at risk (OAR): heart, lung and contralateral breast (Contra Br). Treatment plans for 20 women (10 right-sided and 10 left-sided) previously treated with SWT for WBRT were used to compare (a) SWT; (b) electronic compensators IMRT (E-IMRT); (c) tangential beam IMRT (T-IMRT); (d) coplanar multi-field IMRT (CP-IMRT); and (e) non-coplanar multi-field IMRT (NCP-IMRT). Plans for the breast were compared for (i) dose homogeneity (DH); (ii) conformity index (CI); (iii) mean dose; (iv) maximum dose; (v) minimum dose; and dose to OAR were calculated (vi) heart; (vii) lung and (viii) Contra Br. Compared with SWT, all plans except CP-IMRT gave improvement in at least two of the seven parameters evaluated. T-IMRT and NCP-IMRT resulted in significant improvement in all parameters except DH and both gave significant reduction in doses to OAR. As on initial evaluation NCP-IMRT is likely to be too time consuming to introduce on a large scale, T-IMRT is the preferred technique for WBRT for use in our department.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19453534     DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2009.02043.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1754-9477            Impact factor:   1.735


  21 in total

1.  Dosimetric comparison of the field-in-field technique and tangential wedged beams for breast irradiation.

Authors:  Cem Onal; Aydan Sonmez; Gungor Arslan; Ezgi Oymak; Ayse Kotek; Esma Efe; Serhat Sonmez; Yemliha Dolek
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Radiotherapy dose distribution prediction for breast cancer using deformable image registration.

Authors:  Xue Bai; Binbing Wang; Shengye Wang; Zhangwen Wu; Chengjun Gou; Qing Hou
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.819

3.  Beam angle manipulation to reduce cardiac dose during breast radiotherapy.

Authors:  S Vivekanandan; J Mhlanga; D Launders; A Przeslak; D A L Morgan
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Comparison between the four-field box and field-in-field techniques for conformal radiotherapy of the esophagus using dose-volume histograms and normal tissue complication probabilities.

Authors:  Farzaneh Allaveisi; Amir Nami Moghadam
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Author's reply to Ruo Redda MG et al. concerning "Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and standard wedged tangential technique for whole-breast radiotherapy in Asian women with relatively small breast volumes".

Authors:  Kazuhiko Tsuchiya
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2014-05-10

6.  Comparison of Different Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy Planning.

Authors:  F Gülşen Kara; Ayfer Haydaroğlu; Hakan Eren; Gül Kitapçıoğlu
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2014-04-01

7.  Cardiac dose-sparing effects of deep-inspiration breath-hold in left breast irradiation : Is IMRT more beneficial than VMAT?

Authors:  Mazen Sakka; Leonie Kunzelmann; Martin Metzger; Gerhard G Grabenbauer
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated radiotherapy and standard wedged tangential technique for whole-breast radiotherapy in Asian women with relatively small breast volumes.

Authors:  Kazuhiko Tsuchiya; Rumiko Kinoshita; Shinichi Shimizu; Kentaro Nishioka; Keiichi Harada; Noboru Nishikawa; Ryusuke Suzuki; Hiroki Shirato
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2013-08-28

9.  Comparison of dose distributions and organs at risk (OAR) doses in conventional tangential technique (CTT) and IMRT plans with different numbers of beam in left-sided breast cancer.

Authors:  Hande Bas Ayata; Metin Güden; Cemile Ceylan; Nadir Kücük; Kayihan Engin
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2011-04-08

10.  Evaluation of Auto-Planning for Left-Side Breast Cancer After Breast-Conserving Surgery Based on Geometrical Relationship.

Authors:  Yijiang Li; Han Bai; Danju Huang; Feihu Chen; Yaoxiong Xia
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.