Literature DB >> 19453424

Influenza-associated hospitalization in urban Thai children.

Piyarat Suntarattiwong1, Chotip Sian-nork, Parada Thongtipa, Pranee Thawatsupha, Rungreung Kitphati, Tawee Chotpitayasunondh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies in North America and Europe have shown that young children are at increased risk of serious complications and hospitalization from influenza infection. In Thailand, however, influenza is commonly considered a mild infection that rarely requires hospitalization. An improved understanding of the burden of serious complications from influenza infection in young children is needed to inform clinical treatment and vaccination guidelines.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of children 0-5 years of age with lower respiratory tract infection or influenza-like illness admitted to a pediatric tertiary-care hospital in Bangkok, Thailand during July 2004 to July 2005. All respiratory specimens were tested for influenza using a rapid antigen test and tissue cell culture.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 456 (8.6%) hospitalized children had culture-positive influenza. Eighty percent of hospitalized influenza patients had no underlying chronic illnesses. Nineteen (49%) influenza patients required hospital stays of 5 days or more and two patients required mechanical ventilation. Influenza activity demonstrated bimodal seasonal variation with peak activity from August to October and January to April. Cough was present in 38 (97%) cases and fever >38.5 degrees C was significantly associated with influenza.
CONCLUSION: Influenza is an important cause of hospitalization in children <5 years of age in Thailand. Children <5 years should be considered as a target group when establishing clinical guidelines for antiviral treatment and influenza vaccination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 19453424      PMCID: PMC4941885          DOI: 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2007.00023.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses        ISSN: 1750-2640            Impact factor:   4.380


Introduction

Studies from the United States, Europe and Hong Kong indicate that young children are at risk for serious illness and hospitalization from influenza virus infection. , , , , In the United States, 80% of influenza‐associated hospitalization in children occurs in those <5 years of age and more than half of influenza mortality among children occurs in this age group. , Between 1996 and 2005, the Thailand Ministry of Public Health passive surveillance system reported between 21 176 and 55 559 cases of clinically diagnosed influenza (inpatient and outpatient) annually for an incidence of between 34 and 87 cases per 100 000 population. Between 1999 and 2002, the national influenza surveillance system reported an average annual age‐specific incidence rate in children aged 0–4 years were only 42 per 100 000 population. This figure may underestimate the true burden since influenza often presents with non‐specific respiratory tract symptoms in young children and laboratory confirmation of influenza is not routinely performed in Thailand. In 2001, virological influenza surveillance conducted in outpatient clinics in Thailand identified influenza virus in cell culture in 341 (48%) of 711 respiratory specimens tested. Sixty percent of these specimens were from children. In 2004, a large study in rural eastern Thailand found that 11% of hospitalized pneumonia and 23% of influenza‐like illness (ILI) managed in the outpatient department was the result of influenza virus infection. This population‐based study included comprehensive laboratory confirmation and reported that young children and the elderly were most affected by influenza. The researchers estimated an incidence of 1420 influenza infections per 100 000 outpatients, a burden 43 times greater than that recorded by the national passive surveillance system during the same period. And when compared to the age distribution of the population, the proportion of patients with laboratory confirmed influenza pneumonia who were <1 year of age was 6.2 times higher than expected. Influenza infection is characterized by non‐specific symptoms that can make it difficult to distinguish from febrile respiratory illness caused by other pathogens. , In Thailand, the use of rapid diagnostic tests for influenza are increasing and have been shown to be useful for surveillance and to guide clinical decision making. , Studies from the United States have demonstrated a high burden of serious complications of influenza in otherwise healthy children which lead to a 2004 US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendation that healthy children aged 6–23 months receive influenza vaccine annually. In 2006, the ACIP extended the recommendation for annual influenza vaccination to all children aged 6–59 months. A limited but growing body of evidence suggests that influenza is also an important cause of illness in tropical countries, but more data are needed especially in toddlers and infants. We studied influenza‐associated pediatric hospital admissions, the clinical manifestations of influenza, and the performance of rapid diagnostic tests for influenza A in children <5 years of age at Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health, a tertiary‐care, hospital for children in Bangkok, Thailand.

Materials and methods

We conducted a prospective study of hospitalized children aged 0–5 years at Queen Sirikit National Institute of Child Health during July 5, 2004 to July 3, 2005. All enrolled patients resided in Bangkok metropolitan area. Patients with a diagnosis of lower respiratory tract infections including; viral croup, bronchitis, bronchiolitis and pneumonia were enrolled. In addition, patients with ILI per the WHO case definition with fever >38°C and cough or sore throat in the absence of other known causes (e.g., urinary tract infections, dengue fever etc). Patients reporting an onset of symptoms more than 5 days before admission were excluded. The study was explained to care‐givers and written informed consent was obtained. We then obtained a medical history, conducted a physical examination and collected respiratory swab specimens. All patients were tested using one of two rapid influenza diagnostic tests and also influenza viral culture upon admission. Other medical investigations and treatments were provided by attending physicians according to the routine standard of care. We evaluated the Directigen FLU A® and Now FLU A® antigen detection tests. These tests detect influenza type A and yield results in 15–30 min, but are not able to detect influenza type B. Nasal swabs were collected with plain cotton swab for both rapid tests. Nasopharyngeal swabs for influenza virus isolation were collected with Dacron swab and placed in viral transport media composed of NaCl 1 gm, K2HPO4 1 gm, Beef extract 1 gm, peptone 3 gm, add DW2 up to 200 ml, add antibiotics to make final concentration as follow; Penicillin 1000 unit/ml, Streptomycin 1000 μg/ml, Fungizone 5 μg/ml and pH was adjusted to 7.0 ± 0.2 with 1 N NaOH, VTM then transported chill to the Thai National Influenza Center, National Institute of Health, Ministry of Public Health for influenza virus isolation. The specimens were cultured using Madin Darby Canine Kidney (MDCK) cells and observed for cytopathic effect. Isolated viruses were confirmed as influenza and typed by reference antisera for influenza A or B with immunofluorescent staining technique. Patients with a positive rapid test were treated with oseltamivir (Tamiflu™) according to the recommended doses per kilogram. The patients were followed until improvement or discharge. Because tissue cell culture is considered the gold standard diagnostic method, only children with a positive viral culture were included in this analysis. Clinical findings of influenza and non‐influenza patients were compared using chi‐square test and considered significant at P < 0.05. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 12.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Four hundred and fifty six patients were enrolled. The male to female ratio was 1.5:1. Eighty percent of patients were younger than 2‐years old. Sixty‐three percent of patients were enrolled on day 4 or 5 after the onset of the illness (Table 1).
Table 1

 Characteristics of the enrolled patients

Number of patients (%)
Age (month)
 0–12231 (50.7)
 13–24134 (29.4)
 25–3648 (10.5)
 36–4828 (6.1)
 >4815 (3.3)
Gender
 Male274 (60.1)
 Female182 (39.9)
Chronic underlying condition
 None354 (77.6)
 Pulmonary53 (11.6)
 Cardiac19 (4.2)
 Neurologic13 (2.9)
 Others17 (3.7)
Enrollment day since onset of illness
 13 (0.7)
 253 (11.6)
 3111 (24.3)
 4125 (27.4)
 5164 (36.0)
Characteristics of the enrolled patients Influenza viruses were isolated in 39 patients (8.6%). Thirty‐four of them were influenza A (87.2%) and five of them were influenza B (12.8%). Most of the influenza B viruses were isolated during December 2004 to February 2005 (Fig. 1). Influenza was isolated throughout the year except in November and May. Influenza activity demonstrated seasonal variation with two peaks during August to October and January to April. The highest monthly proportion of influenza positive patients was in February (16.7%) (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

 Influenza infection by months.

Influenza infection by months. Among 39 cases of culture‐confirmed influenza, the mean age of influenza positive patients in this study was 20 months (3–53 months). Thirty‐one patients (79.5%) were previously healthy while others had underlying diseases, including asthma or hyperactive airway diseases 4 (10.3%), cerebral palsy 1 (2.6%), ventricular septal defect 1 (2.6%), adrenogenital syndrome 1 (2.6%) and Sotos syndrome 1 (2.6%). The clinical features of influenza were high fever (T > 38.5°C), cough, constitutional symptoms (anorexia, irritability, and lethargy), rhinorrhea, myalgia, vomiting, respiratory distress, abnormal chest auscultations (wheezing, rale, and stridor), injected pharynx, diarrhea, conjunctival injection, and seizure. Temperature >38.6°C, conjunctival injection and stridor were significantly higher in influenza patients (P < 0.05) while respiratory distress and rale were significantly higher in non‐influenza patients (P < 0.05). Seizures were presented in 10.3% of influenza patients and 7.4% of non‐influenza patients (Table 2).
Table 2

 Clinical features of influenza and non‐influenza children

SymptomNumber of patients (%) P‐value
Influenza (n = 39)Non‐influenza (n = 417)
Temperature
 36.5–37.5°C7 (17.9)98 (23.5)0.431
 37.6–38.5°C9 (23.1)159 (38.1)0.062
 38.6–41°C23 (59.0)160 (38.4)0.012*
Cough38 (97.4)408 (97.8)0.595
Constitutional symptoms38 (97.4)392 (94.0)0.715
Rhinorrhea38 (97.4)402 (96.4)1.000
Myalgia5a (71.4)14b (43.8)0.235
Vomiting26 (66.7)297 (71.2)0.589
Respiratory distress22 (56.4)305 (73.1)0.027*
Abnormal breath sounds
 Wheezing, rhonchi22 (56.4)265 (63.5)0.377
 Rale11 (28.2)219 (52.5)0.004*
 Inspiratory stridor8 (20.5)13 (3.1)0.000*
Injected pharynx18 (46.2)154 (36.9)0.256
Diarrhea13 (33.3)95 (22.8)0.167
Conjunctival injection4 (10.3)9 (2.2)0.019*
Seizure4 (10.3)31 (7.4)0.526

a n = 7; b n = 32 (only in evaluable older children); *P < 0.05.

Clinical features of influenza and non‐influenza children a n = 7; b n = 32 (only in evaluable older children); *P < 0.05. There were seven children with influenza were positive by rapid test but not the viral culture. The mean age of these patients was 14 months compared to 20 months in culture‐confirmed patients. Among the seven patients, clinical features were high fever (T > 38.5°C) (100%), cough (100%), constitutional symptoms (anorexia, irritability, and lethargy) (100%), rhinorrhea (86%), vomiting (71%), respiratory distress (43%), and seizure (14%). The features were similar to culture‐confirmed patients except the fever; all seven patients had high fever (T > 38.5°C) while in culture‐confirmed influenza the majority (59%) had high fever and the rest had low‐grade or no fever (Table 2). The clinical diagnosis on admission for these children with culture‐confirmed influenza included lower respiratory tract infection (pneumonia, bronchitis, bronchiolitis, and viral croup), upper respiratory tract infection (rhinopharyngitis and pharyngitis), influenza, viral myositis, and gastroenteritis (Table 3).
Table 3

 Clinical diagnosis on admission

DiseasesNumber of patients (%)
Lower respiratory tract infection27 (68.9)
 Pneumonia14 (35.6)
 Bronchiolitis2 (5.1)
 Bronchitis3 (7.7)
 Croup8 (20.5)
Upper respiratory tract infection7 (18.0)
 Rhinopharyngitis6 (15.4)
 Pharyngitis1 (2.6)
Others5 (12.9)
 Influenza3 (7.7)
 Viral myositis1 (2.6)
 Gastroenteritis1 (2.6)
Total39 (100)
Clinical diagnosis on admission Among 39 influenza patients, 20 (51%) required oxygen therapy. Two patients needed mechanical ventilation; one case was previously healthy and the other had underlying Sotos syndrome with recurrent pneumonia. No patient died. The length of the hospital stay was 1–24 days, the highest percentage was between 6–10 days (23.1%) and 48.8% required hospital stays of 5 days or longer (Table 4).
Table 4

 Length of hospital stay

Length of stay (day)Number of patients (%)
12 (5.1)
25 (12.8)
37 (17.9)
46 (15.4)
54 (10.3)
6–109 (23.1)
>106 (15.4)
Total39 (100)
Length of hospital stay

Performance of the rapid diagnostic test for influenza A

Rapid tests for influenza A was evaluated compared to viral tissue cell culture. Directigen FLU A® was tested in 394 patients and Now FLU A® was tested in 62 patients (according to changes in the test supplied by the Department of Communicable Diseases Control). The sensitivity of Directigen FLU A® was 50% and specificity was 98% while Now FLU A® had sensitivity 33% and specificity 98% (5, 6).
Table 5

 Sensitivity and specificity of Directigen FLU A®

Rapid test ⊕ Influenza ARapid test Θ influenza ATotal
Disease (viral culture*)
 Influenza A141428
 Not influenza A6360366
 Total20374394
Table 6

 Sensitivity and specificity of Now FLU A®

Rapid test ⊕ Influenza ARapid test Θ influenza ATotal
Disease (viral culture*)
 Influenza A246
 Not influenza A15556
 Total35962

*Positive viral cultures for influenza A but not influenza B (34 from 39 totals) were used to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of the rapid tests, since the tests specified for influenza A diagnosis.

Sensitivity and specificity of Directigen FLU A® Sensitivity and specificity of Now FLU A® *Positive viral cultures for influenza A but not influenza B (34 from 39 totals) were used to evaluate sensitivity and specificity of the rapid tests, since the tests specified for influenza A diagnosis.

Discussion

During 2004–2005, 9% of children ≤5‐years old that were hospitalized with lower respiratory tract infection or ILI were culture‐positive for influenza virus infection. Because our study did not use the more sensitive RT‐PCR or serological laboratory diagnostic methods, it is likely that the true proportion of influenza‐associated hospital admissions was even greater. Influenza was isolated throughout the year round and peak activities occurred during June to October and January to March, a finding that was consistent with published reports. , , Of interest, peak influenza activity in Thailand usually follows the beginning of school year in the middle of May each year. School aged children are believed to play a major role in the propagation of seasonal influenza epidemics. , , The clinical manifestations of influenza infection in our study are similar to those previously described. Fever, cough, rhinorrhea, and constitutional symptoms are the most common presenting symptoms. Respiratory distress and abnormal breath sounds were common physical findings. Influenza in young children was significantly associated with high‐grade fever (temperature >38.6°C). And we found unusual diagnoses included viral myositis and gastroenteritis which shows that in young children influenza virus infection may not present with respiratory tract infection. In our study, seizures were presented in four (10.3%) of influenza patients probably due to high‐grade fevers. Neurological manifestations of influenza virus infection, including febrile seizures, encephalitis, and meningitis have been reported and warrant further study in Thai children. , While the rapid test is proved very useful to identify influenza patients to conduct research and guide treatment decisions, the sensitivity of the tests was less than that reported elsewhere. , The sensitivity of Now Flu A® test and Directigen Flu A® were only 33% and 50%, respectively. These markedly low figures were probably due to two reasons; first, most of the patients in our study were enrolled at the 4th or 5th day of illness, a time when influenza viral antigen may no longer be present in the nasopharynx in sufficient quantities to yield a positive rapid test. Second, we used of a nasal swab specimen rather than a nasal wash, a nasopharyngeal aspirate or a nasopharyngeal swab specimen that is recommended by the manufacturers. This finding underscores the importance of proper training and supervision of clinical staff who use rapid influenza diagnostic tests. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that influenza virus infection is an important cause of hospitalization in healthy Thai children <5 years of age. Clinical characteristics of influenza in young children are high‐grade fever, cough, constitutional symptoms, rhinorhea, and abnormal breath sounds. Especially during the months of July to October and January to March when influenza activity appears to be highest, influenza infection should be considered in the differential diagnosis when caring for patients with acute upper or lower febrile respiratory infection. Rapid tests for influenza A had a moderate sensitivity and high specificity that can help guide clinical treatment and the wider application of these tests in Thailand should be considered. Further research on influenza infection in Thai children using RT‐PCR, serology, and tissue cell culture laboratory diagnostic method is needed to improve clinical care, inform vaccine introduction decisions, and to develop improved practices for non‐pharmaceutical interventions to control seasonal epidemics.
  25 in total

1.  Epidemiological data on influenza in Asian countries.

Authors:  A W Hampson
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1999-07-30       Impact factor: 3.641

2.  Comparison of the directigen flu A+B membrane enzyme immunoassay with viral culture for rapid detection of influenza A and B viruses in respiratory specimens.

Authors:  Andreea C Cazacu; Sooyoung E Chung; Jewel Greer; Gail J Demmler
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Heterogeneity of influenza case definitions and implications for interpreting and comparing study results.

Authors:  Kristin L Nichol
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2006-06-09       Impact factor: 3.641

4.  Prevention and Control of Influenza: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP).

Authors:  Nicole M Smith; Joseph S Bresee; David K Shay; Timothy M Uyeki; Nancy J Cox; Raymond A Strikas
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2006-07-28

5.  Childhood influenza vaccination coverage--United States, 2004-05 influenza season.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2006-10-06       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Epidemiology, complications, and cost of hospitalization in children with laboratory-confirmed influenza infection.

Authors:  Krow Ampofo; Per H Gesteland; Jeffery Bender; Michelle Mills; Judy Daly; Matthew Samore; Carrie Byington; Andrew T Pavia; Rajendu Srivastava
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  The Japanese experience with vaccinating schoolchildren against influenza.

Authors:  T A Reichert; N Sugaya; D S Fedson; W P Glezen; L Simonsen; M Tashiro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-03-22       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  The influence of rapid influenza diagnostic testing on antibiotic prescribing patterns in rural Thailand.

Authors:  Darlene Bhavnani; Ladarat Phatinawin; Somrak Chantra; Sonja J Olsen; James M Simmerman
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 3.623

9.  Isolation and identification of influenza virus strains circulating in Thailand in 2001.

Authors:  Pranee Thawatsupha; Sunthareeya Waicharoen; Paiboon Maneewong; Kanaungkid Prasittikhet; Malinee Chittaganapitch; Pathom Sawanpanyalert
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 0.267

10.  Influenza-associated acute encephalopathy in Japanese children in 1994-2002.

Authors:  Takehiro Togashi; Yoshihiro Matsuzono; Mitsuo Narita; Tsuneo Morishima
Journal:  Virus Res       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.303

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  The burden of influenza B: a structured literature review.

Authors:  W Paul Glezen; Jordana K Schmier; Carrie M Kuehn; Kellie J Ryan; John Oxford
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Literature review of the epidemiology of influenza B disease in 15 countries in the Asia-Pacific region.

Authors:  Lance Jennings; Qiu Sue Huang; Ian Barr; Ping-Ing Lee; Woo Joo Kim; Philippe Buchy; Melvin Sanicas; Bruce A Mungall; Jing Chen
Journal:  Influenza Other Respir Viruses       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 4.380

3.  Incidence, seasonality and mortality associated with influenza pneumonia in Thailand: 2005-2008.

Authors:  James Mark Simmerman; Malinee Chittaganpitch; Jens Levy; Somrak Chantra; Susan Maloney; Timothy Uyeki; Peera Areerat; Somsak Thamthitiwat; Sonja J Olsen; Alicia Fry; Kumnuan Ungchusak; Henry C Baggett; Supamit Chunsuttiwat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Severe human influenza infections in Thailand: oseltamivir treatment and risk factors for fatal outcome.

Authors:  Wanna Hanshaoworakul; James Mark Simmerman; Ubolrat Narueponjirakul; Wiwan Sanasuttipun; Vivek Shinde; Suchada Kaewchana; Darin Areechokechai; Jens Levy; Kumnuan Ungchusak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.