Literature DB >> 19452577

Efficacy of the revised Vienna Classification for diagnosing colorectal epithelial neoplasias.

Kenji Tominaga1, Sumio Fujinuma, Takuro Endo, Yoshihisa Saida, Kei Takahashi, Iruru Maetani.   

Abstract

AIM: To prospectively investigate the efficacy of the revised Vienna Classification for diagnosing colorectal epithelial neoplastic lesions in cold biopsy specimens.
METHODS: Patients were selected for inclusion if they had colorectal epithelial lesions that were not considered suitable for direct endoscopic resection. These included colorectal polyps > or = 10 mm and lesions suspected of being carcinomas capable of invading the colorectal submucosa or beyond, including strictures, based on the cold biopsies obtained from each lesion prior to resection. We investigated the relationship between diagnoses based on cold biopsy samples using the revised Vienna Classification and resected specimens of the same lesions, and the therapeutic implications of diagnoses made using the revised Vienna Classification. The same cold biopsy specimens were also examined using the Japanese Group Classification guidelines, and compared with the resected specimens of the same lesions for reference.
RESULTS: A total of 179 lesions were identified. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the revised Vienna Classification for distinguishing between intramucosal lesions and submucosal invasive carcinomas in cold biopsy specimens was 22.2%, 100%, 100%, and 71.4%, respectively, and for distinguishing between intramucosal lesions and those invading the submucosa or beyond was 59.7%, 100%, 100%, and 37.6%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of the Japanese Group Classification for distinguishing between intramucosal lesions and submucosal invasive carcinomas in cold biopsy specimens was 83.3%, 91.4%, 83.3%, and 91.4%, respectively, and for distinguishing between intramucosal lesions and those invading the submucosa or beyond was 95.1%, 91.4%, 97.9%, and 82.1%, respectively. A total of 137 of 144 carcinomas that had invaded the submucosa or beyond and three high-grade intraepithelial neoplasias were diagnosed as "carcinoma" using the Japanese Group Classification system.
CONCLUSION: The revised Vienna Classification for cold biopsy specimens has high positive predictive value in the diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma invasive to the submucosa or beyond.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19452577      PMCID: PMC2684601          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.15.2351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  11 in total

1.  Discrepancies between East and West.

Authors:  J R Jass
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Biology versus terminology: East meets West in surgical pathology.

Authors:  Joseph Willis; Robert H Riddell
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Biopsy of colorectal polyps is not adequate for grading of neoplasia.

Authors:  G Gondal; T Grotmol; B Hofstad; M Bretthauer; T J Eide; G Hoff
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 10.093

4.  Value of a single forceps biopsy of colonic polyps.

Authors:  E M Livstone; F J Troncale; D G Sheahan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Diagnostic criteria for gastrointestinal carcinomas in Japan and Western countries: proposal for a new classification system of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  R J Schlemper; Y Kato; M Stolte
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.029

6.  The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  R J Schlemper; R H Riddell; Y Kato; F Borchard; H S Cooper; S M Dawsey; M F Dixon; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; J F Fléjou; K Geboes; T Hattori; T Hirota; M Itabashi; M Iwafuchi; A Iwashita; Y I Kim; T Kirchner; M Klimpfinger; M Koike; G Y Lauwers; K J Lewin; G Oberhuber; F Offner; A B Price; C A Rubio; M Shimizu; T Shimoda; P Sipponen; E Solcia; M Stolte; H Watanabe; H Yamabe
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Differences in the diagnostic criteria used by Japanese and Western pathologists to diagnose colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  R J Schlemper; M Itabashi; Y Kato; K J Lewin; R H Riddell; T Shimoda; P Sipponen; M Stolte; H Watanabe
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Predictive histopathologic factors for lymph node metastasis in patients with nonpedunculated submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma.

Authors:  Kenji Tominaga; Yukihiro Nakanishi; Satoshi Nimura; Kimio Yoshimura; Yoshihiro Sakai; Tadakazu Shimoda
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited.

Authors:  M F Dixon
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Value of multiple forceps biopsies in assessing the malignant potential of colonic polyps.

Authors:  V Pugliese; B Gatteschi; H Aste; G Nicolò; F Munizzi; A Giacchero; P Bruzzi
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  1981-02-28
View more
  8 in total

1.  More advanced or aggressive colorectal cancer is associated with a higher incidence of "high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia" on biopsy-based pathological examination.

Authors:  X B Wei; X H Gao; H Wang; C G Fu; W Q Zheng; J M Zheng; W Zhang; L J Liu
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  Diagnostic value, safety, and histopathologic discrepancy risk factors for endoscopic forceps biopsy and transrectal ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy in rectum lesions.

Authors:  Min Liu; Zhen-Hai Lu; Qiao-Xuan Wang; Wei Zheng; Xiao-Qing Pei; Feng Han; Jian-Hua Zhou; Xi Lin; De-Sen Wan; An-Hua Li
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

3.  Histopathologic discrepancy between endoscopic forceps biopsy and final pathology and the role of transrectal ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy.

Authors:  Jin Roh; Choong-Kyun Noh
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-02

4.  Early rectal cancer: the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) clinical consensus conference.

Authors:  Mario Morino; Mauro Risio; Simon Bach; Regina Beets-Tan; Krzysztof Bujko; Yves Panis; Philip Quirke; Bjorn Rembacken; Eric Rullier; Yutaka Saito; Tonia Young-Fadok; Marco Ettore Allaix
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Quality assurance in pathology in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis—European recommendations.

Authors:  Phil Quirke; Mauro Risio; René Lambert; Lawrence von Karsa; Michael Vieth
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Intramucosal carcinoma of the appendix arising from traditional serrated adenoma.

Authors:  Carlos Augusto Real Martinez; Júlia Cutovoi; Debora Helena Rossi; Luciana Rodrigues Meirelles; Maria de Lourdes Setsuko Ayrizono; Raquel Franco Leal; Cláudio Saddy Rodrigues Coy
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2015-04-22

7.  Helicobacter pylori Eradication for Metachronous Gastric Cancer: An Unsuitable Methodology Impeding Broader Clinical Usage.

Authors:  Alexios-Fotios A Mentis; Efthimios Dardiotis
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  A new practical classification of desmoplastic reaction in endoscopic forceps biopsy of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Haiyan Jing; Liang Shang; Shulei Zhao; Zhigang Yao; Beibei Lv; Xiaolong Zhu
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.303

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.