Literature DB >> 19452210

Multimodal perioperative rehabilitation for colonic surgery in the elderly.

B Rumstadt1, N Guenther, P Wendling, R Engemann, C T Germer, M Schmid, K Kipfmueller, M K Walz, W Schwenk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditional perioperative care for colonic surgery in elderly patients is associated with increased morbidity and mortality compared to that of younger patients. Although multimodal perioperative rehabilitation has evolved as a valid concept to improve postoperative outcome, its use has not yet been established for colonic surgery in the elderly.
METHODS: Data from 24 German hospitals performing multimodal perioperative rehabilitation as the standard perioperative care for elderly patients who have undergone elective colonic resection was assessed in a prospective multicenter study between April 2005 and April 2007.
RESULTS: A total of 742 patients aged > or = 70 were examined. Overall compliance with the multimodal care protocol decreased with increasing age. Although laparoscopic colonic surgery was performed in 39.1% of the septuagenarians, the number decreased to 25.1% in the very old patients. The overall complication rate was 22.9% in the septuagenarians (18.1% surgical and 11.6% general complications) and increased in the very old patients to 38.4% (28.0% and 23.6%, respectively) The overall mortality rate was 1.0% and showed no age-specific variations.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall morbidity did increase with age, it was still less when compared to that of historical groups with traditional care. Therefore, multimodal perioperative rehabilitation should be recommended for the elderly.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19452210     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-009-0018-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  26 in total

Review 1.  Anaesthesia, surgery, and challenges in postoperative recovery.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Jørgen B Dahl
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Future perspectives and research initiatives in fast-track surgery.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-08-19       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Clinical advantages of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in the elderly.

Authors:  Bo Feng; Min-Hua Zheng; Zhi-Hai Mao; Jian-Wen Li; Ai-Guo Lu; Ming-Liang Wang; Wei-Guo Hu; Feng Dong; Yan-Yan Hu; Lu Zang; Hong-Wei Li
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Impact of age on in-hospital mortality of surgical patients in a German university hospital.

Authors:  Andrej Udelnow; Steffen Leinung; Dierk Schreiter; Manfred Schönfelder; Peter Würl
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 3.250

6.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection.

Authors:  Conor P Delaney; Massarat Zutshi; Anthony J Senagore; Feza H Remzi; Jeffrey Hammel; Victor W Fazio
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.585

8.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet; Douglas W Wilmore
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in elderly patients.

Authors:  Chun-Nan Yeh; Wei-Chen Lee; Long-Bin Jeng; Miin-Fu Chen
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb
View more
  10 in total

1.  [Fast-track: evaluation of a new concept].

Authors:  W Schwenk
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Tailor-made enhanced recovery programme for older patients.

Authors:  A Deytrikh; S Tou; R Bergamaschi
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Do older patients (> 80 years) also benefit from ERAS after colorectal resection? A safety and feasibility study.

Authors:  Katrien Boon; Gabriele Bislenghi; André D'Hoore; Nele Boon; Albert M Wolthuis
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  [Elective colorectal fast-track resections-Treatment adherence due to coordination by specialized nursing personnel].

Authors:  Wolfgang Schwenk; Ina Lang; Marion Huhn
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Short-term outcomes and benefits of ERAS program in elderly patients undergoing colorectal surgery: a case-matched study compared to conventional care.

Authors:  Patricia Tejedor; Carlos Pastor; Santiago Gonzalez-Ayora; Mario Ortega-Lopez; Hector Guadalajara; Damian Garcia-Olmo
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Enhanced Recovery Program for Colorectal Surgery: a Focus on Elderly Patients Over 75 Years Old.

Authors:  Maria Carmen Lirosi; Flavio Tirelli; Alberto Biondi; Maria Cristina Mele; Cristina Larotonda; Laura Lorenzon; Domenico D'Ugo; Antonio Gasbarrini; Roberto Persiani
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  A systematic review of the intervention components, adherence and outcomes of enhanced recovery programmes in older patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Katleen Fagard; Albert Wolthuis; André D'Hoore; Marleen Verhaegen; Jos Tournoy; Johan Flamaing; Mieke Deschodt
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 3.921

8.  Impact of Compliance with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program on the Outcomes Among Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Zhong-En Li; Shi-Bao Lu; Chao Kong; Wen-Zhi Sun; Peng Wang; Si-Tao Zhang
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  NutriCatt Protocol Improves Body Composition and Clinical Outcomes in Elderly Patients Undergoing Colorectal Surgery in ERAS Program: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Emanuele Rinninella; Alberto Biondi; Marco Cintoni; Pauline Raoul; Francesca Scialanga; Eleonora Persichetti; Gabriele Pulcini; Roberto Pezzuto; Roberto Persiani; Domenico D'Ugo; Antonio Gasbarrini; Maria Cristina Mele
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Enhanced Recovery After Colorectal Surgery (ERAS) in Elderly Patients Is Feasible and Achieves Similar Results as in Younger Patients.

Authors:  Håvard Mjørud Forsmo; Christian Erichsen; Anne Rasdal; Hartwig Körner; Frank Pfeffer
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2017-05-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.