Literature DB >> 19451856

Multicenter study of nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in children being evaluated for sexual abuse.

Carolyn M Black1, Elizabeth M Driebe, Laurie A Howard, Nancy N Fajman, Mary K Sawyer, Rebecca G Girardet, Robert L Sautter, Earl Greenwald, Consuelo M Beck-Sague, Elizabeth R Unger, Joseph U Igietseme, Margaret R Hammerschlag.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of sexually transmitted infections in children suspected of sexual abuse is challenging due to the medico-legal implications of test results. Currently, the forensic standard for diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) infections is culture. In adults, nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) are superior to culture for CT, but these tests have been insufficiently evaluated in pediatric populations for forensic purposes.
METHODS: We evaluated the use of NAATs, using urine and genital swabs versus culture for diagnosis of CT and NG in children evaluated for sexual abuse in 4 US cities. Urine and a genital swab were collected for CT and NG NAATs along with routine cultures. NAAT positives were confirmed by PCR, using an alternate target.
RESULTS: Prevalence of infection among 485 female children were 2.7% for CT and 3.3% for NG by NAAT. The sensitivity of urine NAATs for CT and NG relative to vaginal culture was 100%. Eight participants with CT-positive and 4 with NG-positive NAATs had negative culture results (P = 0.018 for CT urine NAATs vs. culture). There were 24 of 485 (4.9%) female participants with a positive NAAT for CT or NG or both versus 16 of 485 (3.3%) with a positive culture for either, resulting in a 33% increase in children with a positive diagnosis.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that NAATs on urine, with confirmation, are adequate for use as a new forensic standard for diagnosis of CT and NG in children suspected of sexual abuse. Urine NAATs offer a clear advantage over culture in sensitivity and are less invasive than swabs, reducing patient trauma and discomfort.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19451856     DOI: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31819b592e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J        ISSN: 0891-3668            Impact factor:   2.129


  11 in total

1.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.

Authors:  Kimberly A Workowski; Gail A Bolan
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2015-06-05

2.  Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae--2014.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2014-03-14

Review 3.  Medical and legal implications of testing for sexually transmitted infections in children.

Authors:  Margaret R Hammerschlag; Christina D Guillén
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 4.  Laboratory Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infections in Cases of Suspected Child Sexual Abuse.

Authors:  Xuan Qin; Ann J Melvin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Guidelines for the use of molecular biological methods to detect sexually transmitted pathogens in cases of suspected sexual abuse in children.

Authors:  Margaret R Hammerschlag; Charlotte A Gaydos
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2012

6.  Development of PCR assays for detection of Trichomonas vaginalis in urine specimens.

Authors:  Claudiu I Bandea; Kahaliah Joseph; Evan W Secor; Laurie A Jones; Joseph U Igietseme; Robert L Sautter; Margaret R Hammerschlag; Nancy N Fajman; Rebecca G Girardet; Carolyn M Black
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-06       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  A guide to utilization of the microbiology laboratory for diagnosis of infectious diseases: 2013 recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM)(a).

Authors:  Ellen Jo Baron; J Michael Miller; Melvin P Weinstein; Sandra S Richter; Peter H Gilligan; Richard B Thomson; Paul Bourbeau; Karen C Carroll; Sue C Kehl; W Michael Dunne; Barbara Robinson-Dunn; Joseph D Schwartzman; Kimberle C Chapin; James W Snyder; Betty A Forbes; Robin Patel; Jon E Rosenblatt; Bobbi S Pritt
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Molecular Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Chlamydia trachomatis in the United States.

Authors:  April L Harkins; Erik Munson
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-06-12

9.  Could urine be useful for the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis pneumonia in infancy?

Authors:  Joan L Robinson; Kay Meier; Bonita E Lee; Bryce Larke
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 2.803

Review 10.  Diagnostic Procedures to Detect Chlamydia trachomatis Infections.

Authors:  Thomas Meyer
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2016-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.