Literature DB >> 19451802

High epidermal growth factor receptor expression in metastatic colorectal cancer lymph nodes may be more prognostic of poor survival than in primary tumor.

Yanhong Deng1, Brenda F Kurland, Jianping Wang, Jiong Bi, Wen Li, Sujata Rao, Ping Lan, Tongyu Lin, Edward Lin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: High epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in the primary tumor predicts poor survival in colorectal cancer. However, EGFR expression may be discordant in primary tumor versus nodal or distant metastasis. We evaluated prognostic values of high EGFR expression in nodal metastasis versus primary tumor tissue.
METHODS: Tissue microarrays from 94 surgically resected colorectal primary tumors were analyzed for EGFR expression using immunohistochemistry along with 49 paired positive metastatic nodes and 19 distant metastases. Proportional odds regression and log-rank tests described the association of tumor stage and survival with EGFR, dichotomized to low expression (0, 1) versus high expression (2, 3).
RESULTS: High EGFR expression rates in the primary tumor, metastatic lymph node and distant metastases were 18%, 24%, and 21%, respectively. The concordance rate was 71% for stage III/IV patients. High EGFR expression in primary tumor was associated with higher tumor stage (odds ratio 4.3, P = 0.005) and thus predicted poor survival (P = 0.046). High EGFR expression in the primary tumor was not associated with survival in patients with stage III or IV disease, whereas high EGFR expression in metastatic lymph nodes was associated with relatively poor survival (P = 0.005), for both stage III (P = 0.002) and stage IV patients (P = 0.014). Concordant high EGFR expression in primary tumor and lymph nodes conferred added risk of death (P = 0.003), conversely, concordant EGFR-negative primary tumor and lymph node was protective (P = 0.097).
CONCLUSIONS: EGFR expression may be discordant among primary, nodes, and metastases in colorectal cancer. High EGFR expressions in metastatic lymph nodes seem to be more accurate in predicting survival than in primary or metastatic tissues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19451802     DOI: 10.1097/COC.0b013e3181891326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0277-3732            Impact factor:   2.339


  9 in total

Review 1.  A review of the most promising biomarkers in colorectal cancer: one step closer to targeted therapy.

Authors:  Vanessa Deschoolmeester; Marc Baay; Pol Specenier; Filip Lardon; Jan B Vermorken
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2010-06-28

2.  The pattern of epidermal growth factor receptor variation with disease progression and aggressiveness in colorectal cancer depends on tumor location.

Authors:  Petros C Papagiorgis; Adamantia E Zizi; Sophia Tseleni; Ioannis N Oikonomakis; Nikolaos I Nikiteas
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 2.967

3.  Concomitant tumor expression of EGFR and TATI/SPINK1 associates with better prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Selja Koskensalo; Johanna Louhimo; Jaana Hagström; Mikael Lundin; Ulf-Håkan Stenman; Caj Haglund
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The prognostic values of EGFR expression and KRAS mutation in patients with synchronous or metachronous metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ching-Wen Huang; Hsiang-Lin Tsai; Yi-Ting Chen; Chun-Ming Huang; Cheng-Jen Ma; Chien-Yu Lu; Chao-Hung Kuo; Deng-Chyang Wu; Chee-Yin Chai; Jaw-Yuan Wang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2013-12-13       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Interferon-induced transmembrane protein 1-mediated EGFR/SOX2 signaling axis is essential for progression of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ying-Gui Yang; Young Wha Koh; Ita Novita Sari; Nayoung Jun; Sanghyun Lee; Lan Thi Hanh Phi; Kwang Seock Kim; Yoseph Toni Wijaya; Sang Hun Lee; Moo-Jun Baek; Dongjun Jeong; Hyog Young Kwon
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2018-12-08       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Targeting Cancer Resistance via Multifunctional Gold Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Pedro Pedrosa; M Luísa Corvo; Margarida Ferreira-Silva; Pedro Martins; Manuela Colla Carvalheiro; Pedro M Costa; Carla Martins; L M D R S Martins; Pedro V Baptista; Alexandra R Fernandes
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Detecting Tumor Metastases: The Road to Therapy Starts Here.

Authors:  M E Menezes; S K Das; I Minn; L Emdad; X-Y Wang; D Sarkar; M G Pomper; P B Fisher
Journal:  Adv Cancer Res       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 6.242

8.  SPINK1 promotes colorectal cancer progression by downregulating Metallothioneins expression.

Authors:  R Tiwari; S K Pandey; S Goel; V Bhatia; S Shukla; X Jing; S M Dhanasekaran; B Ateeq
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2015-08-10       Impact factor: 7.485

9.  Are ADC values of readout-segmented echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging (RESOLVE) correlated with pathological prognostic factors in rectal adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Cui Tang; Mou-Bin Lin; Jin-Lei Xu; Lan-Hua Zhang; Xiao-Ming Zuo; Zhong-Shuai Zhang; Meng-Xiao Liu; Jin-Ming Xu
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 2.754

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.