Literature DB >> 19451376

Perceptual adaptation to facial asymmetries.

Gillian Rhodes1, Kim Louw, Emma Evangelista.   

Abstract

Humans and other animals are highly sensitive to deviations from bilateral symmetry and prefer symmetric mates. Fluctuating asymmetries (FAs) are random deviations from perfect symmetry that can result from developmental instability. Human perceptions of facial asymmetry are driven by FAs and insensitive to directional asymmetries (DAs), which have a consistent direction of bias (e.g., left side always larger) across the population and are unrelated to developmental stability. We hypothesized that perceptual adaptation may filter out DAs and provide a proximate mechanism for this perceptual focus on FAs. We created a small population of faces with DAs by applying a unilateral distortion to the same side of each face. After 5 min of adaptation, (new) faces with these DAs looked less asymmetric and the most symmetric-looking distortion shifted toward the adapting asymmetry level. Parallel changes occurred for attractiveness. We suggest that perceptual adaptation may provide the proximate mechanism for an evolutionarily adaptive focus on FAs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19451376     DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.3.503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  13 in total

1.  Orientation-contingent face aftereffects and implications for face-coding mechanisms.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Linda Jeffery; Tamara L Watson; Emma Jaquet; Chris Winkler; Colin W G Clifford
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2004-12-14       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Adaptation to asymmetrically distorted faces and its lack of effect on mirror images.

Authors:  Kazunori Morikawa
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 3.  The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 24.137

Review 4.  Space and time in visual context.

Authors:  Odelia Schwartz; Anne Hsu; Peter Dayan
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 34.870

Review 5.  Visual adaptation: neural, psychological and computational aspects.

Authors:  Colin W G Clifford; Michael A Webster; Garrett B Stanley; Alan A Stocker; Adam Kohn; Tatyana O Sharpee; Odelia Schwartz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 6.  Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: a review.

Authors:  G Livshits; E Kobyliansky
Journal:  Hum Biol       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 0.553

7.  Bilateral symmetry and sexual selection: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  A P Møller; R Thornhill
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Aftereffects for face attributes with different natural variability: adapter position effects and neural models.

Authors:  Rachel Robbins; Elinor McKone; Mark Edwards
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Developmental stability, disease and medicine.

Authors:  R Thornhill; A P Møller
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  1997-11

10.  Fitting the mind to the world: face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects.

Authors:  Gillian Rhodes; Linda Jeffery; Tamara L Watson; Colin W G Clifford; Ken Nakayama
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-11
View more
  8 in total

1.  Estimating patient-specific and anatomically correct reference model for craniomaxillofacial deformity via sparse representation.

Authors:  Li Wang; Yi Ren; Yaozong Gao; Zhen Tang; Ken-Chung Chen; Jianfu Li; Steve G F Shen; Jin Yan; Philip K M Lee; Ben Chow; James J Xia; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Lateralization of kin recognition signals in the human face.

Authors:  Maria F Dal Martello; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Individual Aesthetic Preferences for Faces Are Shaped Mostly by Environments, Not Genes.

Authors:  Laura Germine; Richard Russell; P Matthew Bronstad; Gabriëlla A M Blokland; Jordan W Smoller; Holum Kwok; Samuel E Anthony; Ken Nakayama; Gillian Rhodes; Jeremy B Wilmer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Attractiveness is influenced by the relationship between postures of the viewer and the viewed person.

Authors:  Marco Bertamini; Christopher Byrne; Kate M Bennett
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-05-21

5.  The Role of Familiarity for Representations in Norm-Based Face Space.

Authors:  Stella J Faerber; Jürgen M Kaufmann; Helmut Leder; Eva Maria Martin; Stefan R Schweinberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Stimulus requirements for face perception: an analysis based on "totem poles".

Authors:  Carrie L Paras; Michael A Webster
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-02-12

7.  Face adaptation effects: reviewing the impact of adapting information, time, and transfer.

Authors:  Tilo Strobach; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-06-03

8.  Adaptation effects to attractiveness of face photographs and art portraits are domain-specific.

Authors:  Gregor U Hayn-Leichsenring; Nadine Kloth; Stefan R Schweinberger; Christoph Redies
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-06-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.