BACKGROUND:Prasugrel is a novel thienopyridine that reduces new or recurrent myocardial infarctions (MIs) compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. This effect must be balanced against an increased bleeding risk. We aimed to characterize the effect of prasugrel with respect to the type, size, and timing of MI using the universal classification of MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 13 608 patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention randomized toprasugrel or clopidogrel and treated for 6 to 15 months in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38). Each MI underwent supplemental classification as spontaneous, secondary, or sudden cardiac death (types 1, 2, and 3) or procedure related (Types 4 and 5) and examined events occurring early and after 30 days. Prasugrel significantly reduced the overall risk of MI (7.4% versus 9.7%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 0.85; P<0.0001). This benefit was present for procedure-related MIs (4.9% versus 6.4%; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.88; P=0.0002) and nonprocedural (type 1, 2, or 3) MIs (2.8% versus 3.7%; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.88; P=0.0013) and consistently across MI size, including MIs with a biomarker peak > or =5 times the reference limit (HR. 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.86; P=0.0001). In landmark analyses starting at 30 days, patients treated with prasugrel had a lower risk of any MI (2.9% versus 3.7%; HR, 0.77; P=0.014), including nonprocedural MI (2.3% versus 3.1%; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.92; P=0.0069). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel for up to 15 months in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduces the risk of MIs that are procedure related and spontaneous and those that are small and large, including new MIs occurring during maintenance therapy.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Prasugrel is a novel thienopyridine that reduces new or recurrent myocardial infarctions (MIs) compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. This effect must be balanced against an increased bleeding risk. We aimed to characterize the effect of prasugrel with respect to the type, size, and timing of MI using the universal classification of MI. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 13 608 patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention randomized to prasugrel or clopidogrel and treated for 6 to 15 months in the Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TRITON-TIMI 38). Each MI underwent supplemental classification as spontaneous, secondary, or sudden cardiac death (types 1, 2, and 3) or procedure related (Types 4 and 5) and examined events occurring early and after 30 days. Prasugrel significantly reduced the overall risk of MI (7.4% versus 9.7%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.67 to 0.85; P<0.0001). This benefit was present for procedure-related MIs (4.9% versus 6.4%; HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.88; P=0.0002) and nonprocedural (type 1, 2, or 3) MIs (2.8% versus 3.7%; HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.88; P=0.0013) and consistently across MI size, including MIs with a biomarker peak > or =5 times the reference limit (HR. 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.86; P=0.0001). In landmark analyses starting at 30 days, patients treated with prasugrel had a lower risk of any MI (2.9% versus 3.7%; HR, 0.77; P=0.014), including nonprocedural MI (2.3% versus 3.1%; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.92; P=0.0069). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with prasugrel compared with clopidogrel for up to 15 months in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention significantly reduces the risk of MIs that are procedure related and spontaneous and those that are small and large, including new MIs occurring during maintenance therapy.
Authors: Heidi M Crane; Robin M Nance; Susan R Heckbert; Corey Ritchings; Lisa Rosenblatt; Matthew Budoff; Brian R Wood; David L Tirschwell; H Nina Kim; William C Mathews; Elvin Geng; Richard D Moore; Peter W Hunt; Joseph J Eron; Greer A Burkholder; Daniel R Drozd; Felicia C Chow; Kyra J Becker; Joseph R Zunt; Emily L Ho; Rizwan Kalani; Andrew Huffer; Bridget M Whitney; Michael S Saag; Mari M Kitahata; Joseph A C Delaney Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Date: 2019-08-15 Impact factor: 3.731
Authors: Kris G Vargas; Paul M Haller; Bernhard Jäger; Maximilian Tscharre; Ronald K Binder; Christian Mueller; Bertil Lindahl; Kurt Huber Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Andrew P DeFilippis; Ilya Chernyavskiy; Alok R Amraotkar; Patrick J Trainor; Shalin Kothari; Imtiaz Ismail; Charles W Hargis; Frederick K Korley; Gregor Leibundgut; Sotirios Tsimikas; Shesh N Rai; Aruni Bhatnagar Journal: J Thromb Thrombolysis Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 2.300
Authors: Nathaniel R Smilowitz; Matthew C Weiss; Rina Mauricio; Asha M Mahajan; Kaitlyn E Dugan; Arvind Devanabanda; Claudia Pulgarin; Eugenia Gianos; Binita Shah; Steven P Sedlis; Martha Radford; Harmony R Reynolds Journal: Int J Cardiol Date: 2016-05-13 Impact factor: 4.164
Authors: Robin M Nance; Heidi M Crane; Corey Ritchings; Lisa Rosenblatt; Matthew Budoff; Susan R Heckbert; Daniel R Drozd; William C Mathews; Elvin Geng; Peter W Hunt; Matthew J Feinstein; Richard D Moore; Priscilla Hsue; Joseph J Eron; Greer A Burkholder; Benigno Rodriguez; Michael J Mugavero; Michael S Saag; Mari M Kitahata; Joseph A C Delaney Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2018-08-21 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Sergio Leonardi; Paul W Armstrong; Phillip J Schulte; E Magnus Ohman; L Kristin Newby Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 29.983