Literature DB >> 19450992

Patterns of use of systemic chemotherapy for Medicare beneficiaries with urothelial bladder cancer.

Michael P Porter1, Matthew C Kerrigan, Bonnie M K Donato, Scott D Ramsey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Examine the association between clinical, demographic, and socioeconomic factors and the receipt of systemic chemotherapy for bladder cancer. Examine factors influencing the use of combination chemotherapy plus cystectomy and use of specific chemotherapy drugs over time for bladder cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the SEER-Medicare database were analyzed for patients diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder between 1992 and 2002. Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to assess differences in use of systemic chemotherapy based on demographic and clinical factors, site of care, and year of diagnosis. We assessed the proportion of patients who received chemotherapy in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings as well as use of chemotherapy in the monotherapy setting. We estimated the proportion of claims made for several commonly used chemotherapy agents in the outpatient setting by year.
RESULTS: During follow-up, 13%, 28%, 37%, and 57% of patients with stages 1 through 4, respectively, received systemic chemotherapy for bladder cancer. Chemotherapy use in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant settings within 6 months of diagnosis was not commonly found. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was delivered to 1.4% of stage 2 patients and 11% of stage 4 patients. In 2003, the most frequent claims for intravenous chemotherapy were for gemcitabine, carboplatin, and placlitaxel.
CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy was not generally used as recommended for persons with invasive bladder cancer in this patient population. Studies to clarify potential underutilization and variation in patterns of administration are warranted.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19450992     DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2009.03.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  32 in total

1.  Invasive bladder cancer: ignoring the data.

Authors:  Derek Raghavan
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2013

Review 2.  Increasing utilization of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer in the United States.

Authors:  Kirk A Keegan; Harras B Zaid; Sanjay G Patel; Sam S Chang
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  A nomogram predicting the cancer-specific mortality in patients eligible for radical cystectomy evaluating clinical data and neoadjuvant cisplatinum-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Ettore Di Trapani; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Giorgio Gandaglia; Lorenzo Rocchini; Marco Moschini; Daphne Lizee; Arie Carneiro; Arjun Sivaraman; Eric Barret; François Rozet; Marc Galiano; Mostefa Bennamoun; Renzo Colombo; Nazareno Suardi; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Neoadjuvant induction dose-dense MVAC for muscle invasive bladder cancer: efficacy and safety compared with classic MVAC and gemcitabine/cisplatin.

Authors:  Elisabeth E Fransen van de Putte; Laura S Mertens; Richard P Meijer; Michiel S van der Heijden; Axel Bex; Henk G van der Poel; J Martijn Kerst; Andries M Bergman; Simon Horenblas; Bas W G van Rhijn
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Multicenter assessment of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Homayoun Zargar; Patrick N Espiritu; Adrian S Fairey; Laura S Mertens; Colin P Dinney; Maria C Mir; Laura-Maria Krabbe; Michael S Cookson; Niels-Erik Jacobsen; Nilay M Gandhi; Joshua Griffin; Jeffrey S Montgomery; Nikhil Vasdev; Evan Y Yu; David Youssef; Evanguelos Xylinas; Nicholas J Campain; Wassim Kassouf; Marc A Dall'Era; Jo-An Seah; Cesar E Ercole; Simon Horenblas; Srikala S Sridhar; John S McGrath; Jonathan Aning; Shahrokh F Shariat; Jonathan L Wright; Andrew C Thorpe; Todd M Morgan; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Trinity J Bivalacqua; Scott North; Daniel A Barocas; Yair Lotan; Jorge A Garcia; Andrew J Stephenson; Jay B Shah; Bas W van Rhijn; Siamak Daneshmand; Philippe E Spiess; Peter C Black
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Optimizing care and outcomes of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Christopher M Booth
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2013 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  Systemic, perioperative management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer and future horizons.

Authors:  Samuel A Funt; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  Somatic ERCC2 mutations correlate with cisplatin sensitivity in muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Eliezer M Van Allen; Kent W Mouw; Philip Kim; Gopa Iyer; Nikhil Wagle; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Cong Zhu; Irina Ostrovnaya; Gregory V Kryukov; Kevin W O'Connor; John Sfakianos; Ilana Garcia-Grossman; Jaegil Kim; Elizabeth A Guancial; Richard Bambury; Samira Bahl; Namrata Gupta; Deborah Farlow; Angela Qu; Sabina Signoretti; Justine A Barletta; Victor Reuter; Jesse Boehm; Michael Lawrence; Gad Getz; Philip Kantoff; Bernard H Bochner; Toni K Choueiri; Dean F Bajorin; David B Solit; Stacey Gabriel; Alan D'Andrea; Levi A Garraway; Jonathan E Rosenberg
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 39.397

9.  [Neoadjuvant, inductive or adjuvant chemotherapy of bladder cancer].

Authors:  C-H Ohlmann; M De Santis
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 10.  Multimodal management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jong Chul Park; Deborah E Citrin; Piyush K Agarwal; Andrea B Apolo
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.187

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.