Literature DB >> 19450825

Bladder cancer screening in a high risk asymptomatic population using a point of care urine based protein tumor marker.

Yair Lotan1, Keren Elias, Robert S Svatek, Aditya Bagrodia, Geoffrey Nuss, Brett Moran, Arthur I Sagalowsky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated whether screening high risk asymptomatic individuals with a bladder tumor marker can lead to earlier detection and resultant down staging of bladder cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects at high risk for bladder cancer based on age and smoking or occupational status were solicited from 2 well patient clinics from March 2006 to November 2007. NMP22 BladderChek testing was performed on voided urine samples. Those with positive test results underwent office cystoscopy and cytology testing. Participants were contacted for followup at 12 months after study enrollment to evaluate for unrecognized bladder cancer.
RESULTS: A total of 1,175 men and 327 women underwent BladderChek testing. Mean participant age was 62.5 years (range 46 to 92). Based on 10-year or greater smoking history 1,298 participants were enrolled while 513 were enrolled based on a greater than 15-year high risk occupation for bladder cancer. Positive BladderChek testing was observed in 85 (5.7%) participants and 69 agreed to undergo cystoscopy. Three types of lesions were diagnosed including multifocal, high grade Ta (1); Ta, low grade tumor (1) and marked atypia (1). Followup was available in 1,309 subjects. Mean followup was 12 months (range 0.9 to 25.5) and 2 of 1,309 participants had low grade noninvasive bladder cancer. Evaluation of patient records revealed that 73.4% of participants had urinalysis within 3 years before screening.
CONCLUSIONS: NMP22 BladderChek for screening an asymptomatic, high risk population can detect noninvasive cancers but the low prevalence of bladder cancer in this population did not permit assessment of intervention efficacy. Frequent use of urinalyses in high risk persons may attenuate future efforts to study the effects of bladder cancer screening tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19450825     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  19 in total

1.  [Molecular markers in the diagnostics and therapy of urothelial cancer].

Authors:  C Protzel; O W Hakenberg
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.639

2.  Screening for bladder cancer with urinary tumor markers in chemical workers with exposure to aromatic amines.

Authors:  Beate Pesch; Dirk Taeger; Georg Johnen; Katarzyna Gawrych; Nadine Bonberg; Christian Schwentner; Harald Wellhäusser; Matthias Kluckert; Gabriele Leng; Michael Nasterlack; Yair Lotan; Arnulf Stenzl; Thomas Brüning
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  A Festschrift in Honor of Edward M. Messing, MD, FACS.

Authors:  Jean V Joseph; Ralph Brasacchio; Chunkit Fung; Jay Reeder; Kevin Bylund; Deepak Sahasrabudhe; Shu Yuan Yeh; Ahmed Ghazi; Patrick Fultz; Deborah Rubens; Guan Wu; Eric Singer; Edward Schwarz; Supriya Mohile; James Mohler; Dan Theodorescu; Yi Fen Lee; Paul Okunieff; David McConkey; Hani Rashid; Chawnshang Chang; Yves Fradet; Khurshid Guru; Janet Kukreja; Gerald Sufrin; Yair Lotan; Howard Bailey; Katia Noyes; Seymour Schwartz; Kathy Rideout; Gennady Bratslavsky; Steven C Campbell; Ithaar Derweesh; Per-Anders Abrahamsson; Mark Soloway; Leonard Gomella; Dragan Golijanin; Robert Svatek; Thomas Frye; Seth Lerner; Ganesh Palapattu; George Wilding; Michael Droller; Donald Trump
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2018-10-03

4.  Who should be included in a clinical trial of screening for bladder cancer?: a decision analysis of data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial.

Authors:  Andrew J Vickers; Caroline Bennette; Adam S Kibel; Amanda Black; Grant Izmirlian; Andrew J Stephenson; Bernard Bochner
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Mitochondrial DNA Content as Risk Factor for Bladder Cancer and Its Association with Mitochondrial DNA Polymorphisms.

Authors:  Stephen B Williams; Yuanqing Ye; Maosheng Huang; David W Chang; Ashish M Kamat; Xia Pu; Colin P Dinney; Xifeng Wu
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2015-04-20

6.  High-risk patients with hematuria are not evaluated according to guideline recommendations.

Authors:  Keren Elias; Robert S Svatek; Samir Gupta; Richard Ho; Yair Lotan
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  A smoking cessation program as a resource for bladder cancer patients.

Authors:  Daniel Vilensky; Nathan Lawrentschuk; Karen Hersey; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  Quantitation of rare circulating tumor cells by folate receptor α ligand-targeted PCR in bladder transitional cell carcinoma and its potential diagnostic significance.

Authors:  Fuming Qi; Yuchen Liu; Rongchang Zhao; Xiangjun Zou; Lei Zhang; Jiaqiang Li; Yongqiang Wang; Feiyang Li; Xiaowen Zou; Ye Xia; Xuliang Wang; Li Xing; Cailing Li; Jingxiao Lu; Junlong Tang; Fangjian Zhou; Chunxiao Liu; Yaoting Gui; Zhiming Cai; Xiaojuan Sun
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-27

Review 9.  The health economics of bladder cancer: an updated review of the published literature.

Authors:  Christina Yeung; Tuan Dinh; Joseph Lee
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 10.  Molecular screening for bladder cancer: progress and potential.

Authors:  Anirban P Mitra; Richard J Cote
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 14.432

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.