| Literature DB >> 19450276 |
Tomoyuki Akiyama1, Masahiko Inamori, Hiroshi Iida, Hiroki Endo, Kunihiro Hosono, Kyoko Yoneda, Koji Fujita, Masato Yoneda, Hirokazu Takahashi, Ayumu Goto, Yasunobu Abe, Hiroyuki Kirikoshi, Noritoshi Kobayashi, Kensuke Kubota, Satoru Saito, Yasushi Rino, Atsushi Nakajima.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We aimed to estimate whether the macroscopic extent of gastric mucosal atrophy is associated with a risk for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using a case-control study in Japanese subjects, a population known to have a high prevalence of CagA-positive H. pylori infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19450276 PMCID: PMC2689248 DOI: 10.1186/1471-230X-9-34
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Gastroenterol ISSN: 1471-230X Impact factor: 3.067
Figure 1Classification of an endoscopically evident atrophic pattern. The atrophic border is the boundary between the pyloric and fundic gland territories, which is endoscopically recognized by discriminating differences in the color and height of the gastric mucosa. Cases of closed-type GMA have an atrophic boundary between the fundic mucosa and the pyloric mucosa in the antrum or lesser curvature of the gastric body. Cases of open-type GMA have an atrophic boundary in the lateral wall or greater curvature of the gastric body [8]. C, closed; O, open.
Figure 2An endoscopic image of open-type GMA. The atrophic border, determined by discriminating differences in the color and height of the gastric mucosa, is recognized in the greater curvature of the angular portion. (White arrows indicate the atrophic border).
Comparison of Characteristics between ESCC cases and controls (P value: Mann-Whitney U test; *chi square test; **Fisher's exact test).
| ESCC cases | Controls | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients profiles | |||
| Male/Female | 225/28 | 225/28 | >0.9999 |
| Age (median; range) | 65; 38–86 | 65; 38–86 | >0.9999 |
| BMI (median; range) | 20.9; 14.8–30.8 | 22.8; 14.5–33.1 | <0.0001 |
| Current regular drinker | 210 (83.0%) | 142 (56.1%) | <0.0001* |
| Current smoker | 205 (81.0%) | 133 (52.6%) | <0.0001* |
| GMA Open-type 2, 3 | 164 (64.8%) | 127 (50.2%) | 0.0009* |
| Hiatal hernia | 60 (23.7%) | 74 (29.2%) | 0.1584* |
| Erosive esophagitis | |||
| Total (LA-A to D) | 13 (5.1%) | 64 (25.3%) | <0.0001* |
| Mild (LA-A, B) | 12 (4.7%) | 59 (23.3%) | <0.0001* |
| Severe (LA-C, D) | 1 (0.4%) | 5 (2.0%) | 0.2160** |
| Barrett's epithelium | 80 (31.6) | 114 (45.1%) | 0.0019* |
BMI = body mass index; GMA = gastric mucosal atrophy
Multiple logistic regression analysis of clinical factors associated with ESCC.
| Clinical factors | Odds ratio | 95% confidence interval | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body mass index | 0.870 | 0.813–0.930 | <0.0001 |
| Regular drinking habit | 3.228 | 2.028–5.138 | <0.0001 |
| Smoking habit | 3.231 | 2.062–5.063 | <0.0001 |
| GMA | 1.572 | 1.035–2.386 | 0.0339 |
| Hernia | 0.928 | 0.575–1.498 | 0.7608 |
| Erosive esophagitis | 0.178 | 0.089–0.359 | <0.0001 |
| Barrett's epithelium | 0.671 | 0.434–1.039 | 0.0734 |