Literature DB >> 19449400

Impact of genetic advances and testing for hearing loss: results from a national consumer survey.

Kara A Withrow1, Kelly A Tracy, Sarah K Burton, Virginia W Norris, Hermine H Maes, Kathleen S Arnos, Arti Pandya.   

Abstract

Hearing loss is a common neuro-sensory deficit; nearly 50% of children with hearing loss have a genetic etiology. With the discovery of 40 genes and more than 100 loci involved in hearing loss, genetic testing is becoming more widely available. The information obtained through genetic testing can be perceived and used in different ways by parents of deaf children and deaf adults, based on their prior knowledge and understanding of these advances. It is therefore important to clarify the feelings of these potential consumers towards genetic services for hearing loss and understand their goals for genetic testing. The present study evaluates the feelings of consumers towards the advances in the genetics of hearing loss, the motivations for pursuing testing, and the perceived impact testing may have on their lives. We surveyed 808 parents of children with hearing loss nationally and 156 young deaf adults at Gallaudet University. In this study, learning the etiology of the hearing loss was the most commonly cited motivation for pursuing genetic testing and for parents was the most commonly cited outcome that genetic testing may have on their children's lives. Culturally Deaf respondents were less likely to believe that genetic testing will impact their lives or their children's lives and were less likely to report positive feelings about advances in the genetics of hearing loss. Cultural affiliation and genetic testing status, rather than hearing status, contributed more to the participants' responses. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19449400     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.32800

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  9 in total

Review 1.  Deafness in the genomics era.

Authors:  A Eliot Shearer; Michael S Hildebrand; Christina M Sloan; Richard J H Smith
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Deaf genetic testing and psychological well-being in deaf adults.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Patrick Boudreault; Erin E Baldwin; Michelle Fox; Joshua L Deignan; Yoko Kobayashi; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne Grody; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Deaf adults' reasons for genetic testing depend on cultural affiliation: results from a prospective, longitudinal genetic counseling and testing study.

Authors:  Patrick Boudreault; Erin E Baldwin; Michelle Fox; Loriel Dutton; Leeelle Tullis; Joyce Linden; Yoko Kobayashi; Jin Zhou; Janet S Sinsheimer; Yvonne Sininger; Wayne W Grody; Christina G S Palmer
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2010-05-20

4.  SLC26A4 mutation testing for hearing loss associated with enlargement of the vestibular aqueduct.

Authors:  Taku Ito; Julie Muskett; Parna Chattaraj; Byung Yoon Choi; Kyu Yup Lee; Christopher K Zalewski; Kelly A King; Xiangming Li; Philine Wangemann; Thomas Shawker; Carmen C Brewer; Seth L Alper; Andrew J Griffith
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-05-28

5.  Assessing deaf awareness training: knowledge and attitudes of recent genetic counseling graduates.

Authors:  Honey Nagakura; Gretchen Schneider; James Morris; Katherine A Lafferty; Christina G S Palmer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-07-18       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Provision of genetic services for hearing loss: results from a national survey and comparison to insights obtained from previous focus group discussions.

Authors:  Kara Anne Withrow; Kelly A Tracy; Sarah K Burton; Virginia W Norris; Hermine H Maes; Kathleen S Arnos; Arti Pandya
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Effect of pre-test genetic counseling for deaf adults on knowledge of genetic testing.

Authors:  Erin E Baldwin; Patrick Boudreault; Michelle Fox; Janet S Sinsheimer; Christina G S Palmer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Impact of genetic counseling and Connexin-26 and Connexin-30 testing on deaf identity and comprehension of genetic test results in a sample of deaf adults: a prospective, longitudinal study.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Patrick Boudreault; Erin E Baldwin; Janet S Sinsheimer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Examining the relationship between genetic counselors' attitudes toward deaf people and the genetic counseling session.

Authors:  Emily E Enns; Patrick Boudreault; Christina G S Palmer
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.537

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.