Literature DB >> 19449165

Differences in the antibody response and survival of genetically different varieties of common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) vaccinated with a commercial Aeromonas salmonicida/A. hydrophila vaccine and challenged with A. hydrophila.

Zsigmond Jeney1, Tímea Rácz, Kim D Thompson, Saravanane Poobalane, László Ardó, Alexandra Adams, Galina Jeney.   

Abstract

Males of two strains of carp, wild Duna (D), and inbred Szarvas 22 (22), were selected for high and low stress response. Two purebreds of D and 22, from randomly chosen parents and four crosses, 22 x 22-L (low stress response), 22 x 22-H (high stress response), 22 x D-L (low stress response) and 22 x D-H (high stress response) from selected stress response parents were produced and vaccinated with a commercial Aeromonas salmonicida/Aeromonas hydrophila vaccine and their circulating antibody response evaluated 1, 3, 5, and 7 weeks post-vaccination by ELISA. Significantly higher titres of circulatory antibodies against A. hydrophila were found in the families 22 and cross 22 x 22-L compared to other groups. The development of circulatory antibodies against A. hydrophila in all crosses having at least one D parent was low and remained low throughout the experiment. The level of circulatory antibodies against atypical A. salmonicida in the inbred strain increased following a booster vaccination with the highest values measured in inbred strain 22 and cross 22 x 22 L. The different varieties of carp had different levels of survival against experimental challenge with A. hydrophila. The greatest survival was obtained in strain 22 and cross 22 x 22-L, while ~90% of D wild carp and cross 22 x D (independent of their stress response) died. Survival results correlated well with the antibody response of the different groups: 22 and 22 x 22-L had the highest antibody titres against A. hydrophila and the greatest level of survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19449165     DOI: 10.1007/s10695-009-9329-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem        ISSN: 0920-1742            Impact factor:   2.794


  2 in total

1.  Immune responses of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus L.) clones: I. Non-specific responses.

Authors:  M R Sarder; K D Thompson; D J Penman; B J McAndrew
Journal:  Dev Comp Immunol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.636

2.  Genetic variation in the humoral immune response in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) against Aeromonas salmonicida A-layer.

Authors:  A Strømsheim; D M Eide; K T Fjalestad; H J Larsen; K H Røed
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 2.046

  2 in total
  6 in total

1.  Dose dependence specific and non-specific immune responses of Indian major carp (L. rohita Ham) to intraperitoneal injection of formalin killed Aeromonas hydrophila whole cell vaccine.

Authors:  Supriya Dash; Swagat Kumar Das; Juhi Samal; Prasant Kumar Ojha; Jayanta Kumar Patra; Hrudayanath Thatoi
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 2.459

2.  The response of New-season Nile tilapia to Aeromonas hydrophila vaccine.

Authors:  Salah M Aly; Aqel S Albutti; Arshad H Rahmani; Nashwa M Abdel Atti
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

Review 3.  A Review of Molecular Responses of Catfish to Bacterial Diseases and Abiotic Stresses.

Authors:  Tao Zhou; Zihao Yuan; Suxu Tan; Yulin Jin; Yujia Yang; Huitong Shi; Wenwen Wang; Donghong Niu; Lei Gao; Wansheng Jiang; Dongya Gao; Zhanjiang Liu
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 4.  An Overview of Challenges Limiting the Design of Protective Mucosal Vaccines for Finfish.

Authors:  Hetron Mweemba Munang'andu; Stephen Mutoloki; Øystein Evensen
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 7.561

5.  Quantitative proteomic analysis of cell envelope preparations under iron starvation stress in Aeromonas hydrophila.

Authors:  Zujie Yao; Zhihong Wang; Lina Sun; Wanxin Li; Yan Shi; Ling Lin; Wenxiong Lin; Xiangmin Lin
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Comparative transcriptional analysis reveals distinct expression patterns of channel catfish genes after the first infection and re-infection with Aeromonas hydrophila.

Authors:  Xingjiang Mu; Julia W Pridgeon; Phillip H Klesius
Journal:  Fish Shellfish Immunol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 4.581

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.