Literature DB >> 19448592

Differential protein immunoexpression profiles in appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a special reference to classification and predictive factors.

Sun Och Yoon1, Baek-hui Kim, Hye Seung Lee, Gyeong Hoon Kang, Woo Ho Kim, Young A Kim, Je Eun Kim, Mee Soo Chang.   

Abstract

Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms have been the focus of considerable debate in recent years. We histologically classified 70 appendiceal mucinous neoplasms into three categories: 32 mucinous adenoma, 23 mucinous neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, and 15 mucinous adenocarcinomas. Immunohistochemistry was performed for 24 proteins in different functional categories, specifically, oncogenic proteins (bcl-2, beta-catenin, CEA, C-erbB2, c-kit, Cox-2, Cyclin D1, EGFR, Ki-67, NF-kappaB, VEGF), tumor suppressors (E-cadherin, FHIT, hMLH1, p53, p63, smad4), cell-cycle regulators (p21, p27, p16), and mucin proteins (MUC1, MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6). Our data showed that 9 out of the 24 proteins were more frequently altered in the mucinous adenocarcinoma group than in the mucinous adenoma group (P<0.05), including beta-catenin (13% in mucinous adenoma vs 60% in mucinous adenocarcinoma), CyclinD1 (44 vs 87%), Ki-67 (high labeling index: 31 vs 67%), NF-kappaB (19 vs 60%), VEGF (16 vs 87%), E-cadherin (0 vs 47%), p53 (6 vs 40%), MUC2 (9 vs 67%), and MUC5AC (3 vs 40%). The distinct immunoexpression profile of mucinous neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential was placed between those of mucinous adenoma and mucinous adenocarcinoma (P<0.05). Moreover, the mucinous adenoma, mucinous neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, and mucinous adenocarcinoma categories displayed differences in terms of the number of altered markers among the nine proteins (P<0.05; mean 1.4 vs 2.6 vs 5.5, respectively). In mucinous adenocarcinoma, the p53 status was related to disease-free survival and overall survival of patients (P<0.05, both). NF-kappaB status and the number of altered protein markers made statistically marginal impacts on disease-free survival; also beta-catenin loss, on overall survival of patients. In conclusion, protein immunoexpression profiles may facilitate the classification of appendiceal mucinous neoplasms. In our study, the three tumor categories of mucinous adenoma, mucinous neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential, and mucinous adenocarcinoma exhibited distinct immunoexpression profiles. Five and more altered protein markers, p53 overexpression, NF-kappaB positivity, and beta-catenin loss were predictive factors of adverse clinical outcomes in appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinomas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19448592     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2009.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  5 in total

1.  Establishment and characterization of a murine xenograft model of appendiceal mucinous adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Arun A Mavanur; Vamsi Parimi; Mark O'Malley; Marina Nikiforova; David L Bartlett; Jon M Davison
Journal:  Int J Exp Pathol       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  High-level microsatellite instability in appendiceal carcinomas.

Authors:  Melissa W Taggart; John Galbincea; Paul F Mansfield; Keith F Fournier; Richard E Royal; Michael J Overman; Asif Rashid; Susan C Abraham
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma associated with adjacent sessile serrated lesion of the appendix vermiform: a case report.

Authors:  Osamu Kinoshita; Yasutoshi Murayama; Yoshiaki Kuriu; Masayoshi Nakanishi; Chohei Sakakura; Eigo Otsuji
Journal:  Case Rep Pathol       Date:  2014-07-09

4.  A comprehensive expression analysis of mucins in appendiceal carcinoma in a multicenter study: MUC3 is a novel prognostic factor.

Authors:  Hiroaki Shibahara; Michiyo Higashi; Seiya Yokoyama; Karine Rousseau; Iwao Kitazono; Masahiko Osako; Hiroshi Shirahama; Yukie Tashiro; Yasuhiro Kurumiya; Michihiko Narita; Shingo Kuze; Hiroshi Hasagawa; Takehito Kato; Hitoshi Kubota; Hideaki Suzuki; Toshiyuki Arai; Yu Sakai; Norihiro Yuasa; Masahiko Fujino; Shinji Kondo; Yoshichika Okamoto; Tatsuyoshi Yamamoto; Takashi Hiromatsu; Eiji Sasaki; Kazuhisa Shirai; Satoru Kawai; Koutarou Hattori; Hideki Tsuji; Osamu Okochi; Masaki Sakamoto; Akinobu Kondo; Naomi Konishi; Surinder K Batra; Suguru Yonezawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  NF-κB Expression and Outcomes in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Dang Wu; Pin Wu; Lufeng Zhao; Lijian Huang; Zhigang Zhang; Shuai Zhao; Jian Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.817

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.