Literature DB >> 19448181

Evidence-based podiatric medicine: importance of systematic reviews in clinical practice.

Fiona Hawke1, Joshua Burns, Karl B Landorf.   

Abstract

Due to the exponential increase in the quantity and quality of podiatric medicine-related research during the past decade, podiatric physicians are inundated with an insurmountable volume of research relevant to clinical practice. Systematic reviews can refine this literature by using explicit, rigorous, and reproducible methods to identify, critically appraise, and synthesize the best evidence from all clinical trials to answer clearly defined clinical questions. The Cochrane Collaboration is an international not-for-profit organization created to improve the user-friendliness and accessibility of medical literature mainly through preparing and maintaining systematic reviews of health-care interventions. The Cochrane Library currently contains more than 50 podiatric medicine-relevant systematic reviews summarizing and synthesizing evidence from many hundreds of randomized controlled trials evaluating interventions for foot problems. Although more than 60 countries worldwide have open online access to The Cochrane Library, in the United States, only the state of Wyoming has free access to full-text reviews. In an era demanding an evidence-based approach for every clinical intervention, high-quality systematic reviews streamline podiatric medical literature by reducing the time, cost, and training necessary to establish a solid evidence base for practice.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19448181     DOI: 10.7547/0980260

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Podiatr Med Assoc        ISSN: 1930-8264


  3 in total

1.  Distribution of country of origin in studies used in Cochrane Reviews.

Authors:  Robert F Wolff; Stefan Reinders; Michael Barth; Gerd Antes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Plantar fasciitis - to jab or to support? A systematic review of the current best evidence.

Authors:  Hayley Uden; Eva Boesch; Saravana Kumar
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2011-05-24

3.  'Trial and error…', '…happy patients' and '…an old toy in the cupboard': a qualitative investigation of factors that influence practitioners in their prescription of foot orthoses.

Authors:  Anita Ellen Williams; Ana Martinez-Santos; Jane McAdam; Christopher James Nester
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.303

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.