OBJECTIVE: To revise the Physical Activity Disability Scale (PADS) and to explore the acceptability and test-retest reliability of the revised measure, the PADS-R, in people with multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: This study was conducted over three phases: (1) PADS-R questionnaire development including modification to the original PADS, field testing and refinement; (2) PADS-R scoring; (3) PADS-R acceptability and reliability assessment, where participants completed the PADS-R twice over the telephone, three days apart, and then answered a series of semi-structured questions on the instrument's acceptability. SUBJECTS: Participants were recruited from the local Multiple Sclerosis Society, Stroke Foundation and Auckland District Health Board depending on the purpose of each phase: (1) PADS-R questionnaire development (n = 30, multiple sclerosis); (2) PADS-R scoring (n = 293, multiple sclerosis; and n = 83, stroke); and (3) PADS-R acceptability and reliability assessment (n = 29, multiple sclerosis). MAIN MEASURES: Physical Activity Disability Scale-Revised (PADS-R) RESULTS: The PADS-R took approximately 20 minutes to administer and most (n = 25; 86%) participants reported it to be easy to understand and complete. All participants reported that it enabled them to give an accurate picture of their physical activities. In terms of test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient was high (0.87 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.78, 0.96)), but the 95% limits of agreement were wide (+/-1.13). When observations which potentially represented important changes in activity were excluded, these limits narrowed considerably (+/-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: The PADS-R appears to be a conceptually and psychometrically sound measure of physical activity for people with chronic neurological conditions.
OBJECTIVE: To revise the Physical Activity Disability Scale (PADS) and to explore the acceptability and test-retest reliability of the revised measure, the PADS-R, in people with multiple sclerosis. DESIGN: This study was conducted over three phases: (1) PADS-R questionnaire development including modification to the original PADS, field testing and refinement; (2) PADS-R scoring; (3) PADS-R acceptability and reliability assessment, where participants completed the PADS-R twice over the telephone, three days apart, and then answered a series of semi-structured questions on the instrument's acceptability. SUBJECTS:Participants were recruited from the local Multiple Sclerosis Society, Stroke Foundation and Auckland District Health Board depending on the purpose of each phase: (1) PADS-R questionnaire development (n = 30, multiple sclerosis); (2) PADS-R scoring (n = 293, multiple sclerosis; and n = 83, stroke); and (3) PADS-R acceptability and reliability assessment (n = 29, multiple sclerosis). MAIN MEASURES: Physical Activity Disability Scale-Revised (PADS-R) RESULTS: The PADS-R took approximately 20 minutes to administer and most (n = 25; 86%) participants reported it to be easy to understand and complete. All participants reported that it enabled them to give an accurate picture of their physical activities. In terms of test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient was high (0.87 (95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.78, 0.96)), but the 95% limits of agreement were wide (+/-1.13). When observations which potentially represented important changes in activity were excluded, these limits narrowed considerably (+/-0.89). CONCLUSIONS: The PADS-R appears to be a conceptually and psychometrically sound measure of physical activity for people with chronic neurological conditions.
Authors: Nicola Veronese; Lee Smith; Mario Barbagallo; Gianluigi Giannelli; Maria Gabriella Caruso; Anna Maria Cisternino; Maria Notarnicola; Chao Cao; Thomas Waldhoer; Lin Yang Journal: Acta Neurol Belg Date: 2021-05-05 Impact factor: 2.396
Authors: Elisabeth Anens; Lena Zetterberg; Charlotte Urell; Margareta Emtner; Karin Hellström Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2017-12-01 Impact factor: 2.474