Literature DB >> 19447692

Upward and downward physical appearance comparisons: development of scales and examination of predictive qualities.

Kerry S O'Brien1, Peter Caputi, Rona Minto, Gregory Peoples, Carlie Hooper, Sally Kell, Elise Sawley.   

Abstract

Despite good theoretical and empirical rationale for assessing tendencies to make upward and downward physical appearance comparisons no measure for these specific constructs exists. The present work developed and tested the psychometric properties of upward and downward physical appearance comparison scales. The scales were administered to participants (N=224) along with measures of general appearance comparison tendencies, body image, disordered eating, Antifat and Antigay attitudes. The scales displayed good psychometric properties. Importantly, the upward but not downward physical appearance comparison scale predicted lower Appearance Evaluation and higher EAT-26 scores. Conversely, the downward but not upward physical appearance comparison scale predicted higher Appearance Evaluation and greater Antifat Attitudes (Dislike). The scales were unrelated to a nonappearance related construct. These new measures fill a gap in the literature and may be of benefit to researchers interested in body image, appearance concerns, eating disorders, social comparison, and obesity prejudice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19447692     DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2009.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Body Image        ISSN: 1740-1445


  17 in total

1.  Mediators of the relationship between thin-ideal internalization and body dissatisfaction in the natural environment.

Authors:  Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Anna M Bardone-Cone; Ross D Crosby; Scott G Engel; Stephen A Wonderlich; Cynthia M Bulik
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2016-07-05

2.  Peer Group Similarity in Perceptions of Pubertal Timing.

Authors:  Natalie Kretsch; Jane Mendle; Jessica Duncan Cance; Kathryn Paige Harden
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2015-04-04

3.  Predicting anti-fat attitudes: individual differences based on actual and perceived body size, weight importance, entity mindset, and ethnicity.

Authors:  Shannon Rich Scott; Lisa H Rosen
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2014-10-19       Impact factor: 4.652

4.  Towards a sociocultural model of weight stigma.

Authors:  Sarah Nutter; Shelly Russell-Mayhew; Jessica F Saunders
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 4.652

5.  Eating disorder-related social comparison in college women's everyday lives.

Authors:  Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 4.861

6.  The development and validation of the Physical Appearance Comparison Scale-3 (PACS-3).

Authors:  Lauren M Schaefer; J Kevin Thompson
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2018-05-21

7.  Exposure with response prevention (ERP) for body dissatisfaction in a group therapy format: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Brad A Mac Neil; Pauline Leung; Vanessa Montemarano
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  A naturalistic examination of social comparisons and disordered eating thoughts, urges, and behaviors in college women.

Authors:  Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Anna C Ciao; Erin C Accurso
Journal:  Int J Eat Disord       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 4.861

9.  Does Media Literacy Mitigate Risk for Reduced Body Satisfaction Following Exposure to Thin-Ideal Media?

Authors:  Siân A McLean; Susan J Paxton; Eleanor H Wertheim
Journal:  J Youth Adolesc       Date:  2016-02-15

10.  The validity and reliability of the Farsi version of the Body, Eating, and Exercise Comparison Orientation Measure (F-BEECOM) among Iranian male and female students.

Authors:  Reza N Sahlan; Jessica F Saunders; Ellen E Fitzsimmons-Craft; Fatemeh Taravatrooy
Journal:  Body Image       Date:  2020-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.