Literature DB >> 19447504

Cellular host transcriptional responses to influenza A virus in chicken tracheal organ cultures differ from responses in in vivo infected trachea.

Sylvia S Reemers1, Marian J Groot Koerkamp, Frank C Holstege, Willem van Eden, Lonneke Vervelde.   

Abstract

In this study a viral infection of a tissue culture model system was compared to an in vivo infection, which is of importance to gauge the utility of the model system. The aim was to characterize early immune responses induced by avian influenza virus using tracheal organ cultures (TOC) as a model system. First, the in vitro system was optimized to ensure that the host transcription responses were only influenced by virus infection and not by differences in viral load. Upper and lower trachea both could be used in the cultures because the virus load was the same. Cilia motility was not affected in non-infected TOC and only slightly in infected TOC at 24h post-inoculation. Gene expression profiles of early immune responses were analyzed in in vitro infected TOC, and were compared to the responses found in in vivo infected trachea. The gene expression profile in infected TOC suggested the up regulation of innate anti-viral responses that were triggered by attachment, entry and uptake of virus leading to several signalling cascades including NF-kappaB regulation. Genes associated with IFN mediated responses were mainly type I IFN related. Overlapping gene expression profiles between non-infected and infected TOC suggested that tissue damage during excision induced wound healing responses that masked early host responses to the virus. These responses were confirmed by real-time quantitative RT-PCR showing up regulation of IL-1beta and IL-6. Microarray analysis showed that gene expression profiles of infected and non-infected TOC had a large overlap. This overlap contained many immune-related genes associated with inflammatory responses, apoptosis and immune system process and development. Infected TOC and in vivo infected trachea shared few significantly differentially expressed genes. The gene expression profile of infected TOC contained fewer genes which were expressed at reduced amplitude of change. Genes that were common between TOC and trachea were associated with early immune responses likely triggered by virus attachment and entry. Most of the genes were associated with IFN-mediated responses, mainly type I IFN related. Our study implicates that although the TOC model is suitable for culturing of virus and lectin or virus binding studies, it is not suitable for measuring early immune responses upon viral infection at host transcriptional level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19447504     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2009.04.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol        ISSN: 0165-2427            Impact factor:   2.046


  16 in total

1.  Identification of avian RIG-I responsive genes during influenza infection.

Authors:  Megan R W Barber; Jerry R Aldridge; Ximena Fleming-Canepa; Yong-Dong Wang; Robert G Webster; Katharine E Magor
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 4.407

2.  Reassortment of NS segments modifies highly pathogenic avian influenza virus interaction with avian hosts and host cells.

Authors:  Henning Petersen; Zhongfang Wang; Eva Lenz; Stephan Pleschka; Silke Rautenschlein
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  Differential cellular gene expression in duck trachea infected with a highly or low pathogenic H5N1 avian influenza virus.

Authors:  Pascale Massin; Claire Deleage; Aurélie Oger; François-Xavier Briand; Hélène Quenault; Yannick Blanchard
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.099

4.  Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus infection in chickens but not ducks is associated with elevated host immune and pro-inflammatory responses.

Authors:  Suresh V Kuchipudi; Meenu Tellabati; Sujith Sebastian; Brandon Z Londt; Christine Jansen; Lonneke Vervelde; Sharon M Brookes; Ian H Brown; Stephen P Dunham; Kin-Chow Chang
Journal:  Vet Res       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 3.683

5.  Composition of the Hemagglutinin Polybasic Proteolytic Cleavage Motif Mediates Variable Virulence of H7N7 Avian Influenza Viruses.

Authors:  E M Abdelwhab; Jutta Veits; Reiner Ulrich; Elisa Kasbohm; Jens P Teifke; Thomas C Mettenleiter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Identification of differentially expressed miRNAs in chicken lung and trachea with avian influenza virus infection by a deep sequencing approach.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Vinayak Brahmakshatriya; Huifeng Zhu; Blanca Lupiani; Sanjay M Reddy; Byung-Jun Yoon; Preethi H Gunaratne; Jong Hwan Kim; Rui Chen; Junjun Wang; Huaijun Zhou
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  18S rRNA is a reliable normalisation gene for real time PCR based on influenza virus infected cells.

Authors:  Suresh V Kuchipudi; Meenu Tellabati; Rahul K Nelli; Gavin A White; Belinda Baquero Perez; Sujith Sebastian; Marek J Slomka; Sharon M Brookes; Ian H Brown; Stephen P Dunham; Kin-Chow Chang
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2012-10-08       Impact factor: 4.099

8.  Replication and adaptive mutations of low pathogenic avian influenza viruses in tracheal organ cultures of different avian species.

Authors:  Henning Petersen; Mikhail Matrosovich; Stephan Pleschka; Silke Rautenschlein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Transcriptomic Profiling of Virus-Host Cell Interactions following Chicken Anaemia Virus (CAV) Infection in an In Vivo Model.

Authors:  Efstathios S Giotis; Lisa Rothwell; Alistair Scott; Tuanjun Hu; Richard Talbot; Daniel Todd; David W Burt; Elizabeth J Glass; Pete Kaiser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Local Innate Responses to TLR Ligands in the Chicken Trachea.

Authors:  Neda Barjesteh; Tamiru Negash Alkie; Douglas C Hodgins; Éva Nagy; Shayan Sharif
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.