Literature DB >> 19446925

[Coming out of the whirlwind of abuse. Qualitative research on gender violence].

Francisca Muñoz Cobos1, María Luz Burgos Varo2, Amalia Carrasco Rodríguez3, María Luisa Martín Carretero4, Josefa Río Ruiz5, Inmaculada Ortega Fraile6, Mercedes Villalobos Bravo7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To analyse the experience from the point of view of women who have suffered domestic violence. To identify factors related to continuing or resolving the problem.
DESIGN: Qualitative interpretative research from a phenomenological perspective. POPULATION SAMPLE: Women, detected in primary care, who have suffered domestic violence and have recognised the problem, and who accepted to participate in this research. MULTICENTRE STUDY: Six health centres in the city of Malaga. METHODS AND TECHNIQUES: The technique used is the biographical narration using individual open interviews between social workers and women. This narration was tape-recorded and verbatim transcribed to written text. Grounded theory. Qualitative analysis was made with ATLAS-TI 5.2. OUTCOMES: A total of 35 narrations were analysed. The abuse situation was described as "whirl-wind" metaphor (blindness-isolation-helplessness-suffering-destiny-dependence-fantasies -about love, protection, happiness, change- and vicious circles). Enduring experience is reported to be related to several factors: inculcated gender values, family-ideal, uncertainty, annulment, personal failure sensation, love, support defects, self-image, children protection, multiple fears and material aspects. They identified two types of "exit": passive and active with different mechanisms and repercussions. Exit experience is related to: limit situations, children intervention, family ideal attempts, and fear-loss. Leaving is a transitional process or "pathway". Institutional support is not always guaranteed and emotional support is better evaluated than a legal one.
CONCLUSIONS: Enduring and coming out are reported as two qualitatively different states, which involve many cultural and personal factors. There is a gap between these two states with a process that varies depending on the involvement of the women in decision-making.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19446925      PMCID: PMC7022084          DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2009.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aten Primaria        ISSN: 0212-6567            Impact factor:   1.137


  26 in total

Review 1.  Should health professionals screen women for domestic violence? Systematic review.

Authors:  Jean Ramsay; Jo Richardson; Yvonne H Carter; Leslie L Davidson; Gene Feder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-08-10

2.  In search of how people change. Applications to addictive behaviors.

Authors:  J O Prochaska; C C DiClemente; J C Norcross
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1992-09

3.  [Protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of a consciousness-raising and training intervention for primary care professionals, in order to improve detection of domestic violence (ISFVIDAP)].

Authors:  M Carmen Fernández Alonso; Sonia Herrero Velázquez; José Aurelio Cordero Guevara; José Angel Maderuelo Fernández; José Angel Madereuelo Fernández; María Luisa González Castro
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2006 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.137

4.  The process of change for victims of intimate partner violence: support for a psychosocial readiness model.

Authors:  Patricia A Cluss; Judy C Chang; Lynn Hawker; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Diane Dado; Raquel Buranosky; Sheri Goldstrohm
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct

5.  Health care interventions for intimate partner violence: what women want.

Authors:  Judy C Chang; Patricia A Cluss; LeeAnn Ranieri; Lynn Hawker; Raquel Buranosky; Diane Dado; Melissa McNeil; Sarah H Scholle
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb

6.  Using the stages of change model to counsel victims of intimate partner violence.

Authors:  P Y Frasier; L Slatt; V Kowlowitz; P T Glowa
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2001-05

7.  Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Gene S Feder; Madeleine Hutson; Jean Ramsay; Ann R Taket
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-01-09

8.  Intimate partner violence: causes and prevention.

Authors:  Rachel Jewkes
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-04-20       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Survivors of intimate partner violence speak out: trust in the patient-provider relationship.

Authors:  Tracy A Battaglia; Erin Finley; Jane M Liebschutz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Medical management of intimate partner violence considering the stages of change: precontemplation and contemplation.

Authors:  Therese Zink; Nancy Elder; Jeff Jacobson; Brenda Klostermann
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Domestic violence: are we improving?].

Authors:  Vicent Cerdà i Alfonso
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 1.137

2.  [Knowledge of gender-based violence in the population seen in primary care].

Authors:  Inmaculada González Lozoya; Ana Serrano Martínez; Nuria García Sánchez; María del Campo Giménez; Beatriz Moreno Ruiz; Ana Belén González Lozoya; Julio Montoya Fernández; Juan Manuel Téllez Lapeira; Francisco Escobar Rabadán
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 1.137

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.