Literature DB >> 19446744

Pediatric supratentorial ependymomas show more frequent deletions on chromosome 9 than infratentorial ependymomas: a microsatellite analysis.

Doreen Schneider1, Camelia-Maria Monoranu, Bei Huang, Stefan Rutkowski, Nicolas U Gerber, Jürgen Krauss, Bernhard Puppe, Wolfgang Roggendorf.   

Abstract

Numerous human malignancies, including brain tumors, have been reported to show aberrations on chromosome 9. In our previous screening study in ependymomas, we used microsatellite analysis to identify frequent aberrations on this chromosome. To refine our preliminary analysis of candidate regions, here we use 15 polymorphic microsatellite markers spanning the entire chromosome 9. A total of 48 pairs of matched normal and tumor specimens from patients with ependymoma, including 28 children (mean age, 4.4 years) and 20 adults (mean age, 44.9 years), were genotyped. Allelic imbalances were found in 30/48 patients (62.5%). Pediatric tumors, which were predominantly anaplastic, showed fewer aberrations (57.1%) than adult tumors (70%), and two common regions of deletions were identified (9p21.1 approximately p22.3 and 9q31.3 approximately q33.2). We found that 9q31.3 approximately q33.2, an approximately 8.5-megabase segment containing the DCR1 gene, exhibited the highest number of aberrations (n=33). Adults with ependymomas harboring aberrations on chromosome 9 (n=14) showed significantly longer overall survival than patients of the same group without this aberration (n=6; P=0.034), irrespective of the extent of resection in multivariate analysis. Aberrations of chromosome 9, and particularly of DCR1, may play a role in the prognostic evaluation for ependymomas in adults in the future. In pediatric patients, genetic aberrations were found significantly more often in supratentorial tumors than in tumors with infratentorial location (P=0.007). This result may underscore differences in the origin of these tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19446744     DOI: 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2009.02.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet        ISSN: 0165-4608


  9 in total

1.  Neuronal differentiation distinguishes supratentorial and infratentorial childhood ependymomas.

Authors:  Felipe Andreiuolo; Stéphanie Puget; Matthieu Peyre; Carmela Dantas-Barbosa; Nathalie Boddaert; Cathy Philippe; Audrey Mauguen; Jacques Grill; Pascale Varlet
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Supratentorial ependymoma: disease control, complications, and functional outcomes after irradiation.

Authors:  Efrat Landau; Frederick A Boop; Heather M Conklin; Shengjie Wu; Xiaoping Xiong; Thomas E Merchant
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Portrait of ependymoma recurrence in children: biomarkers of tumor progression identified by dual-color microarray-based gene expression analysis.

Authors:  Matthieu Peyre; Frédéric Commo; Carmela Dantas-Barbosa; Felipe Andreiuolo; Stéphanie Puget; Ludovic Lacroix; Françoise Drusch; Véronique Scott; Pascale Varlet; Audrey Mauguen; Philippe Dessen; Vladimir Lazar; Gilles Vassal; Jacques Grill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The fine structure of ependymomas.

Authors:  Stavros J Baloyannis; Ioannis S Baloyannis
Journal:  CNS Oncol       Date:  2014-01

5.  Outcome of infants and young children with newly diagnosed ependymoma treated on the "Head Start" III prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Rajkumar Venkatramani; Lingyun Ji; Joseph Lasky; Kelley Haley; Alexander Judkins; Shengmei Zhou; Richard Sposto; Randal Olshefski; James Garvin; Tanya Tekautz; Gloria Kennedy; Shahrad Rod Rassekh; Theodore Moore; Sharon Gardner; Jeffrey Allen; Richard Shore; Christopher Moertel; Mark Atlas; Girish Dhall; Jonathan Finlay
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Molecular genetics of ependymoma.

Authors:  Yuan Yao; Stephen C Mack; Michael D Taylor
Journal:  Chin J Cancer       Date:  2011-10

Review 7.  The Similarities and Differences between Intracranial and Spinal Ependymomas : A Review from a Genetic Research Perspective.

Authors:  Chang-Hyun Lee; Chun Kee Chung; Jung Hun Ohn; Chi Heon Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-02-29

8.  Ependymoma relapse goes along with a relatively stable epigenome, but a severely altered tumor morphology.

Authors:  Denise Yang; Till Holsten; Daniela Börnigen; Stephan Frank; Christian Mawrin; Markus Glatzel; Ulrich Schüller
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 6.508

9.  Supratentorial ependymomas in children: Analysis of nine cases.

Authors:  George A Alexiou; Maria Moschovi; Kalliopi Stefanaki; Dimitrios Panagopoulos; Maria Tsotra; George Siozos; George Sfakianos; Neofytos Prodromou
Journal:  J Pediatr Neurosci       Date:  2013-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.