Literature DB >> 19446156

Differences in annual medication costs and rates of dosage increase between tumor necrosis factor-antagonist therapies for rheumatoid arthritis in a managed care population.

Daniel A Ollendorf1, David Klingman, Elisabeth Hazard, Saurabh Ray.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists are commonly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Differences in the dosage and mode of administration of these agents may result in differential rates of dosage adjustment and costs of care.
OBJECTIVE: This study compared dosing patterns and annual costs associated with the use of the subcutaneous TNF antagonists adalimumab and etanercept, and the intravenous TNF antagonist infliximab.
METHODS: A large managed care database (PharMetrics) was used to identify patients with RA who newly initiated TNF-antagonist therapy with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab on or after January 1, 2003, and had at least 6 months of continuous health plan enrollment before initiation of therapy and 12 months of continuous enrollment after initiation. The patients were followed over 12 months of enrollment. Annual pharmacy, inpatient, and outpatient costs were estimated based on plan reimbursements and were compared between cohorts. The average daily dosage (ADD) between prescription refills was used to compare the percentages of patients with greater-than-expected dosing (GTED), defined as 2 consecutive increases in ADD relative to the patient's established maintenance dosage.
RESULTS: A total of 2382 patients (568 adalimumab, 1181 etanercept, 633 infliximab) were included in the analysis. Significantly more patients had GTED with infliximab compared with adalimumab and etanercept (32.1%, 8.5%, and 4.7%, respectively; both comparisons, P < 0.05). For patients with a dosage increase, the mean time to the first GTED was significantly shorter for infliximab compared with adalimu-mab and etanercept (154.5, 173.3, and 167.9 days; both, P < 0.05). The mean annual costs of anti-TNF therapy, adjusted for baseline differences, were significantly greater for infliximab compared with adalimumab and etanercept ($15,617, $12,200, and $12,146; both, P < 0.05). There were also significant differences between infliximab relative to adalimumab and etanercept in total RA-related medication costs ($16,280, $12,989, and $12,794; P < 0.05) and total pharmacy costs ($17,854, $14,805, and $14,398; P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Patients initiating TNF-antagonist treatment for RA with infliximab incurred annual medication costs that were nearly 30% greater than costs in those initiating therapy with adalimumab or etanercept, in part because of the significantly greater rate of GTED in infliximab recipients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19446156     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  20 in total

Review 1.  Dose modifications of anti-TNF drugs in rheumatoid arthritis patients under real-world settings: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rafael Ferriols-Lisart; Francisco Ferriols-Lisart
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 2.  Systematic review of tumor necrosis factor inhibitor discontinuation studies in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Iris Navarro-Millán; Sebastian E Sattui; Jeffrey R Curtis
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.393

3.  Tumor necrosis factor-blocker dose escalation in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a pharmacy benefit management setting.

Authors:  Steven W Blume; Kathleen M Fox; George Joseph; Chien-Chia Chuang; Jessy Thomas; Shravanthi R Gandra
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 3.845

4.  Biologic TNF inhibiting agents for treatment of inflammatory rheumatic diseases: dosing patterns and related costs in Switzerland from a payers perspective.

Authors:  Jan Zeidler; Thomas Mittendorf; Rüdiger Müller; Johannes von Kempis
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2012-09-28

5.  Differential expression of NK receptors CD94 and NKG2A by T cells in rheumatoid arthritis patients in remission compared to active disease.

Authors:  Ceara E Walsh; Elizabeth J Ryan; Cliona O'Farrelly; Lucy Golden-Mason; Oliver FitzGerald; Douglas J Veale; Barry Bresnihan; Ursula Fearon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Biologic TNF inhibiting agents for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: persistence and dosing patterns in Germany.

Authors:  Sarah Neubauer; Mary Cifaldi; Thomas Mittendorf; Arijit Ganguli; Malte Wolff; Jan Zeidler
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2014-11-23

7.  Economic evaluation of anti-TNF agents for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Greece.

Authors:  Vasilis Fragoulakis; Elli Vitsou; Ana Cristina Hernandez; Nikolaos Maniadakis
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2015-01-16

8.  Comparison of Healthcare Costs Between Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Treated with Infused Biologics After Switching from Another Biologic.

Authors:  Stephen S Johnston; Donna McMorrow; Amanda M Farr; Paul Juneau; Sarika Ogale
Journal:  Drugs Real World Outcomes       Date:  2015-03

9.  Cost of tumor necrosis factor blockers per patient with rheumatoid arthritis in a multistate Medicaid population.

Authors:  Machaon Bonafede; George J Joseph; Neel Shah; Nicole Princic; David J Harrison
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-09-15

10.  Drug usage analysis and health care resources consumption in naïve patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Diego Sangiorgi; Maurizio Benucci; Carmela Nappi; Valentina Perrone; Stefano Buda; Luca Degli Esposti
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2015-11-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.