| Literature DB >> 19445274 |
Enrica Perrone1, Maria Stella Padula, Marina Scarpa, Maria Angela Acerbi, Claudio Andreoli, Patrizia Baldoni, Gabriella Bannò, Renato Bregoli, Manfredo Campolieti, Nicola Cataldo, Ghassan Daya, Anna Rita D'Urso, Gaetano Feltri, Alessandra Gualandrini, Giorgio Lambertini, Wainer Mazzi, Gino Paolo Modafferi, Pierpaolo Mussati, Luca Onesti, Cataldo Piancone, Fernando Pieralisi, Maria Cristina Poppi, Alberto Scaglioni, Nycolaos Tsoutsis, Stefano Turrini, Elisabetta Viola, Oreste Capelli.
Abstract
This study aims at evaluating the effectiveness of a computerized-based Clinical Record in monitoring hypertension in a Primary Care Setting. Blood pressure (BP) recording increased by 62% to 70% in the years 2004 to 2006. No improvement, however, was noticeable in the achievement of gold-standard targets in BP control (62% in all period). At the end of 2006 BP was recorded in 65% of patients. Among them, 2/3 of the non diabetics reached < 140/90 mmHg standard, while only 23% of diabetics reached < 130/80 mmHg standard. In conclusion, using a computerized clinical record appears not to be sufficient to obtain good clinical performances, yet it is a necessary first step to clinical audit.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2009 PMID: 19445274
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Recenti Prog Med ISSN: 0034-1193