Literature DB >> 19444950

Delayed visual feedback reveals distinct time scales in balance control.

Maarten R C van den Heuvel1, Ramesh Balasubramaniam, Andreas Daffertshofer, André Longtin, Peter J Beek.   

Abstract

We performed an experiment in which we challenged postural stability in 12 healthy subjects by providing artificial delayed visual feedback. A monitor at eye-height presented subjects with a visual representation of the location of their center-of-pressure (COP) and they were instructed to position their COP as accurately as possible on a small target. Visual feedback of the COP was displayed either in real-time, or delayed by 250, 500, 750, or 1000 ms. In a control condition, no visual feedback was provided. As expected, stability increased during real-time visual feedback compared to when feedback was absent. To identify time scales at which postural control during quiet stance takes place we sought to distinguish between different frequencies. Low frequencies, i.e. slow components of postural sway, showed a monotonic increase in sway amplitude with increasing delay, whereas high frequencies, i.e. fast components of postural sway, showed significantly reduced sway amplitude for delays of 500-750 ms compared to the other delay conditions. Low- and high-frequency components of postural sway thus exhibited differential susceptibility to artificial delays, thereby supporting the notion of postural control taking place on two distinct time scales.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19444950     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  8 in total

1.  Auditory white noise reduces postural fluctuations even in the absence of vision.

Authors:  Jessica Marie Ross; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Effects of delayed auditory and visual feedback on sequence production.

Authors:  J D Kulpa; Peter Q Pfordresher
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visual reliance for balance control in older adults persists when visual information is disrupted by artificial feedback delays.

Authors:  Ting Ting Yeh; Tyler Cluff; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Compensatory Postural Adjustments in an Oculus Virtual Reality Environment and the Risk of Falling in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Miguel F Gago; Darya Yelshyna; Estela Bicho; Hélder David Silva; Luís Rocha; Maria Lurdes Rodrigues; Nuno Sousa
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra       Date:  2016-06-25

5.  Voluntarily controlled but not merely observed visual feedback affects postural sway.

Authors:  Shu Imaizumi; Tomohisa Asai; Kentaro Hiromitsu; Hiroshi Imamizu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  Efficacy of sitting balance training with delayed visual feedback among patients with stroke: a randomized crossover clinical trial.

Authors:  Kota Sawa; Kazu Amimoto; Abdul Chalik Meidian; Keisuke Ishigami; Takuya Miyamoto; Chika Setoyama; Rikuya Suzuki; Miko Tamura; Mitsusuke Miyagami
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2022-08-03

7.  The effects of augmented visual feedback during balance training in Parkinson's disease: study design of a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Maarten R C van den Heuvel; Erwin E H van Wegen; Cees J T de Goede; Ingrid A L Burgers-Bots; Peter J Beek; Andreas Daffertshofer; Gert Kwakkel
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 2.474

8.  Attentional demands associated with augmented visual feedback during quiet standing.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kręcisz; Michał Kuczyński
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.