| Literature DB >> 19444341 |
Antonio Vinicius Holanda Barbosa1, Gerhilde Callou Sampaio, Fábio Almeida Gomes, Daniel Pinto de Oliveira, Diana Santana de Albuquerque, Ana Paula Veras Sobral.
Abstract
This study evaluated the short-term response of human pulp tissue when directly capped with Portland cement. In this series of cases, twenty human third molars that were scheduled for extraction were used. After cavity preparation, pulp exposure was achieved and Portland cement pulp capping was performed. Teeth were extracted after 1, 7, 14 and 21 days following treatment and prepared for histological examination and bacterial detection. Each group had 5 teeth. The results were descriptively analysed. Dentin bridge formation was seen in two teeth with some distance from the material interface (14 and 21 days). Soft inflammatory responses were observed in most of the cases. Bacteria were not disclosed in any specimen. PC exhibited some features of biocompatibility and capability of inducing mineral pulp response in short-term evaluation. The results suggested that PC has a potential to be used as a less expensive pulp capping material in comparison to other pulp capping materials.Entities:
Keywords: Biocompatibility; Portland cement; endodontics; pulp therapy.
Year: 2009 PMID: 19444341 PMCID: PMC2681172 DOI: 10.2174/1874210600903010031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Open Dent J ISSN: 1874-2106
Scores Used for Histological Finds Based on Cox et al. [4], Cox et al. [15] and Akimoto et al. [16] Criteria
| Scores | Inflammatory Cell Response |
|---|---|
| 1 | None or a few scattered inflammatory cells present in the pulp beneath the exposure site |
| 1 | Normal or almost normal tissue morphology below the exposure site and throughout the pulp |
| 1 | New barrier tissue directly adjacent to some portion of the restorative material |
| 1 | Absence of bacterial staining in any section |
The Absolute Values for Inflammatory Cell Response, Soft Tissue Organization, and Dentin Bridge Formation and Bacterial Staining. These Values are Based on Cox et al. [4], Cox et al. [15] and Akimoto et al. [16] Criteria Referred on Table
| Specimens | ICR | STO | DBF | BS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1G1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 2G1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 3G1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 4G1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 5G1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 1G2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 2G2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 3G2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 4G2 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| 5G2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 1G3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 2G3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 3G3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 4G3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| 5G3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 1G4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 2G4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 3G4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 4G4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
| 5G4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 |
ICR – Inflammatory cell response; STO – Soft tissue organization; DBF – Dentinal bridge formation; BS – Bacterial staining; G – Group.