Literature DB >> 19443741

Increases in corticospinal responsiveness during a sustained submaximal plantar flexion.

B W Hoffman1, T Oya, T J Carroll, A G Cresswell.   

Abstract

Studying the responsiveness of specific central nervous system pathways to electrical or magnetic stimulation can provide important information regarding fatigue processes in the central nervous system. We investigated the changes in corticospinal responsiveness during a sustained submaximal contraction of the triceps surae. Comparisons were made between the size of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) elicited by motor cortical stimulation and cervicomedullary motor-evoked potentials (CMEPs) elicited by magnetic stimulation of the descending tracts to determine the site of any change in corticospinal responsiveness. Participants maintained an isometric contraction of triceps surae at 30% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) for as long as possible on two occasions. Stimulation was applied to the motor cortex or the cervicomedullary junction at 1-min intervals during contraction until task failure. Peripheral nerve stimulation was also applied to evoke maximal M waves (M(max)) and a superimposed twitch. Additionally, MEPs and CMEPs were evoked during brief contractions at 80%, 90%, and 100% of MVC as a nonfatigue control. During the sustained contractions, MEP amplitude increased significantly in soleus (113%) and medial gastrocnemius (108%) muscles and, at task failure, matched MEP amplitude in the prefatigue MVC ( approximately 20-25% M(max)). In contrast, CMEP amplitude increased significantly in medial gastrocnemius (51%), but not in soleus (63%) muscle and, at task failure, was significantly smaller than during prefatigue MVC (5-6% M(max) vs. 11-13% M(max)). The data indicate that cortical processes contribute substantially to the increase in corticospinal responsiveness during sustained submaximal contraction of triceps surae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19443741     DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91541.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)        ISSN: 0161-7567


  8 in total

1.  Changes in corticospinal excitability during an acute bout of resistance exercise in the elbow flexors.

Authors:  Ilona Ruotsalainen; Juha P Ahtiainen; Dawson J Kidgell; Janne Avela
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Behaviour of the motoneurone pool in a fatiguing submaximal contraction.

Authors:  Chris J McNeil; Sabine Giesebrecht; Simon C Gandevia; Janet L Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-05-23       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Cortical and segmental excitability during fatiguing contractions of the soleus muscle in humans.

Authors:  Masaki Iguchi; Richard K Shields
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 3.708

4.  Group III/IV locomotor muscle afferents alter motor cortical and corticospinal excitability and promote central fatigue during cycling exercise.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu; Joshua C Weavil; Tyler S Mangum; Jacob E Jessop; Russell S Richardson; David E Morgan; Markus Amann
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 5.  Corticospinal responses to sustained locomotor exercises: moving beyond single-joint studies of central fatigue.

Authors:  Simranjit K Sidhu; Andrew G Cresswell; Timothy J Carroll
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 6.  Physical and cognitive consequences of fatigue: A review.

Authors:  Hoda M Abd-Elfattah; Faten H Abdelazeim; Shorouk Elshennawy
Journal:  J Adv Res       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 10.479

Review 7.  Muscle fatigue: general understanding and treatment.

Authors:  Jing-Jing Wan; Zhen Qin; Peng-Yuan Wang; Yang Sun; Xia Liu
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 8.718

8.  The influence of residual force enhancement on spinal and supraspinal excitability.

Authors:  Caleb T Sypkes; Benjamin J Kozlowski; Jordan Grant; Leah R Bent; Chris J McNeil; Geoffrey A Power
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.