Literature DB >> 19443407

Continuous finasteride therapy for benign prostate hypertrophy upgrades both neuroendorcine differentiation and aggressive prostate cancer.

Marko Tarle1, Borivoj Spajic, Ivo Kraljic, Zvonko Kusic.   

Abstract

Finasteride has been recognized as a drug suitable for the chemoprevention of prostate cancer (PC) by reducing intracellular dihydrotestosterone (DHT) levels. The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) database on continuous finasteride treatment of almost 19 thousands patients indicated the reduction in cancer prevalence by about 25% . However, in this same study more than a twofold increase in high grade aggressive prostate tumors was recorded when compared to controls thus arising serious doubts upon the real benefits of the protocol. Here, our investigation was performed three years on a continuous versus intermittent (six month treatment followed by 6 months resting period) finasteride treatment in 125 BPH patients (pts) each. The overall PC prevalence in both finasteride-treated groups was lower that in untreated controls and thus being in accordance with the PCPT data. However, continuous therapy gave significantly higher incidence in Gleason score (GS)>6 carcinomas compared to intermitted therapy and controls (44.5%, 25% and 18.2% of total acquired PC, respectively). In addition, the acquired elevated chromogranin A (CgA) values were also more than doubled in pts treated continuously compared to the other two groups (13.6%, 5.6% and 6.4%, respectively). Acquired PC GS>6 recorded in pts with a raise in CgA was higher in continuously treated pts (50%) than in the other two studied groups (20% and 25%, respectively). In pts with the retained normal CgA concentration highest PC incidence was found in controls (5.1%) and lower prevalence was recorded in continuously (2.8%) and intermittently treated pts (2.5%) while the respective PC GS>6 incidence was lower in controls than in treated pts. Seemingly, finasteride treatment reduces PC prevalence in pts free of NED but elevates the number of aggressive carcinomas in CgA-positive pts only if continuous treatment is applied. In conclusion, current chemoprevention protocols need to be carefully reconsidered prior to the selection between continuous and discontinued finasteride treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19443407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Res        ISSN: 0250-7005            Impact factor:   2.480


  5 in total

Review 1.  An intermittent approach for cancer chemoprevention.

Authors:  Xiangwei Wu; Scott M Lippman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  The impact of 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors on mortality in a prostate cancer chemoprevention setting: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pedro Glusman Knijnik; Pietro Waltrick Brum; Eduardo Tosetto Cachoeira; Artur de Oliveira Paludo; Antônio Rebello Horta Gorgen; Lucas Medeiros Burttet; Jeruza Lavanholi Neyeloff; Brasil Silva Neto
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  The intriguing role of fibroblasts and c-Jun in the chemopreventive and therapeutic effect of finasteride on xenograft models of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Yi-Nong Niu; Kai Wang; Song Jin; Dong-Dong Fan; Ming-Shuai Wang; Nian-Zeng Xing; Shu-Jie Xia
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 4.  Any Correlation Between Prostate Volume and Incidence of Prostate Cancer: A Review of Reported Data for the Last Thirty Years.

Authors:  Justine R Yamashiro; Werner T W de Riese
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2021-10-10

Review 5.  Prognostic role of neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer, putting together the pieces of the puzzle.

Authors:  Alfredo Berruti; Francesca Vignani; Lucianna Russo; Valentina Bertaglia; Mattia Tullio; Marcello Tucci; Massimiliano Poggio; Luigi Dogliotti
Journal:  Open Access J Urol       Date:  2010-07-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.