Literature DB >> 19443246

What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire?

Christophe Demoulin1, Raymond Ostelo, J André Knottnerus, Rob J E M Smeets.   

Abstract

Although the Roland disability questionnaire (RDQ) is a commonly used questionnaire for patients with low back pain (LBP), several important issues remain understudied. The purposes of this study were to investigate the impact that several parameters (length of test-retest interval, interpretation of the global perceived effect (GPE) scores, methods to estimate standard error of measurement (SEM), intervention and baseline scores) have on various measurement properties, such as agreement (Limits of Agreement (LOA), SEM(agreement)), responsiveness (area under the ROC curve, sensitivity, specificity) and interpretability (optimal cut-off point, Minimal Detectable Change), of the RDQ. RDQ was administered four times to 212 patients with chronic non-specific LBP (first consultation (T-1), eligibility check (T0), randomization/start of treatment (T1) and end of treatment (T2)). They also completed a GPE scale at T2. To study the influence of length of test interval between T-1, T0 and T1, six time intervals were assessed. Analyses of the impact of parameters on responsiveness and interpretability were based on the GPE score and on RDQ score changes (T1 versus T2). Results revealed that agreement parameters decreased with increasing time interval between test-retest. They confirmed the influence of the interpretation of the GPE as well as of the method to calculate the SEM on the magnitude of the Minimal Detectable Change and ROC parameters. Baseline RDQ scores and the way to cluster patients with regard to baseline scores influenced mainly the optimal cut-off point and responsiveness parameters; intervention did not affect the magnitude of the Minimal Detectable Change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19443246     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pain        ISSN: 1090-3801            Impact factor:   3.931


  6 in total

1.  A Systematic Review of Head-to-Head Comparison Studies of the Roland-Morris and Oswestry Measures' Abilities to Assess Change.

Authors:  Anastasia N L Newman; Paul W Stratford; Lori Letts; Gregory Spadoni
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

2.  Acute low back pain and primary care: how to define recovery and chronification?

Authors:  Wolf E Mehling; Viranjini Gopisetty; Michael Acree; Alice Pressman; Tim Carey; Harley Goldberg; Frederick M Hecht; Andrew L Avins
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Psychometric characteristics of the Korean version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Authors:  Jeeyoun Moon; Yong Chul Kim; Soo Young Park; Sang Chul Lee; Seung Pyo Choi; Francis Sahngun Nahm; Pyung Bok Lee; Eui Kyung Goo; Jong-Man Kang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Dependence of the minimal clinically important improvement on the baseline value is a consequence of floor and ceiling effects and not different expectations by patients.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Lori C Guthrie; Maria Alba
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  Responsiveness and minimum important change of the Oswestry Disability Index in Italian subjects with symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Carla Vanti; Silvano Ferrari; Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Pedro Berjano; Marco Monticone
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-02-16

6.  The influence of study population and definition of improvement on the smallest detectable change and the minimal important change of the neck disability index.

Authors:  Wouter Schuller; Raymond W J G Ostelo; Richard Janssen; Henrica C W de Vet
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.186

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.