Literature DB >> 19442969

Reproductive consequences of genome-wide paternal uniparental disomy mosaicism: description of two cases with different mechanisms of origin and pregnancy outcomes.

Carme Morales1, Anna Soler, Cèlia Badenas, Laia Rodríguez-Revenga, Alfons Nadal, José M Martínez, Irene Mademont-Soler, Antoni Borrell, Montserrat Milà, Aurora Sánchez.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the molecular and cytogenetic characterization of two different prenatal cases of androgenetic/biparental mosaicism and review the different possible mechanisms of origin in each case.
DESIGN: Case study and literature review.
SETTING: Tertiary medical center (prenatal diagnosis unit). PATIENT(S): A 26-year-old pregnant woman referred for suspected partial mole placenta and a 33-year-old pregnant woman referred for polyhydramnios and fetal malformations. INTERVENTION(S): Ultrasound examination, prenatal invasive procedures, molecular and cytogenetic analysis, physical and pathologic evaluation, and genetic counseling. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cytogenetic analysis, fluorescent in situ hybridization, and quantitative fluorescence polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) analysis. RESULT(S): The finding of a normal karyotype together with a triploidy-like QF-PCR profile led to the diagnosis of two cases of androgenetic (genome-wide paternal uniparental disomy)/biparental mosaicism. The first case showed placental mesenchymal dysplasia and a normal fetus, and the second one presented a fetus showing Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome features and an apparently normal placenta. CONCLUSION(S): These cases highlight the wide range of possible clinical presentations of androgenetic/biparental mosaicism, the variety of mechanisms of their origin, and the importance of the combination of molecular and cytogenetic analysis to achieve an accurate diagnosis and provide reproductive counseling.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19442969     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.03.090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  6 in total

1.  Assessment of QF-PCR as the first approach in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  Celia Badenas; Laia Rodríguez-Revenga; Carme Morales; Carmen Mediano; Alberto Plaja; Ma Mar Pérez-Iribarne; Anna Soler; Núria Clusellas; Antoni Borrell; Ma Ángeles Sánchez; Elisabeth Miró; Aurora Sánchez; Montserrat Milà; Wladimiro Jiménez
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Mosaics and moles.

Authors:  Lone Sunde; Isa Niemann; Estrid Staehr Hansen; Johnny Hindkjaer; Birte Degn; Uffe Birk Jensen; Lars Bolund
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Aberrant hypomethylation at imprinted differentially methylated regions is involved in biparental placental mesenchymal dysplasia.

Authors:  Saori Aoki; Ken Higashimoto; Hidenori Hidaka; Yasufumi Ohtsuka; Shigehisa Aoki; Hiroyuki Mishima; Koh-Ichiro Yoshiura; Kazuhiko Nakabayashi; Kenichiro Hata; Hitomi Yatsuki; Satoshi Hara; Takashi Ohba; Hidetaka Katabuchi; Hidenobu Soejima
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 7.259

4.  Placentomegaly and placental mesenchymal dysplasia.

Authors:  Minakshi Rohilla; Sujata Siwatch; Vanita Jain; Raje Nijhawan
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-12-23

5.  Mosaic genome-wide maternal isodiploidy: an extreme form of imprinting disorder presenting as prenatal diagnostic challenge.

Authors:  Susanne Bens; Manuel Luedeke; Tanja Richter; Melanie Graf; Julia Kolarova; Gotthold Barbi; Krisztian Lato; Thomas F Barth; Reiner Siebert
Journal:  Clin Epigenetics       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 6.551

6.  Discordance for placental mesenchymal dysplasia in a monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy: A case report.

Authors:  Willem Gheysen; David Strybol; Philippe Moerman; An Steylemans; Anniek Corveleyn; Luc De Catte; Isabel Couck; Liesbeth Lewi
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2018-06-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.