Literature DB >> 19442556

[Review of the main haemovigilance systems in the world].

J-C Faber1.   

Abstract

Since 2002, major progress has occurred worldwide in the context of haemovigilance and significant improvement of the blood chain has come out as a result. Nevertheless different scenarios exist throughout the European Union and outside of Europe: the systems are mandatory or voluntary, notification is required for recipients, donors, processes or activities in the broad context of blood component transfusion. Differing from country to country, notification is mandatory for all adverse reactions or only for serious ones; and so it is with adverse events. Under-reporting is generally considered to be the most important single problem. But there is no doubt that haemovigilance will continue to help improve quality and safety of blood transfusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19442556     DOI: 10.1016/j.tracli.2009.03.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Clin Biol        ISSN: 1246-7820            Impact factor:   1.406


  2 in total

1.  Why Does the Precautionary Principle Suffice for Blood Regulation?

Authors:  Alexandra Seifner; Anthony W Fox
Journal:  Pharmaceut Med       Date:  2021-09-07

2.  Serious Adverse Transfusion Reactions Reported in the National Recipient-Triggered Trace Back System in Korea (2006-2014).

Authors:  Jeong Ran Kwon; Eun Jeong Won; Hyun Jung Jo; Sae Rom Choi; Kyoungyul Lee; Sinyoung Kim; Hyeong Sik Ahn; Young Sill Choi; Duck Cho; Dong Han Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.464

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.