OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the effect of health literacy (HL) on patient-physician communication varies with patient-physician language concordance and communication type. METHODS: 771 outpatients rated three types of patient-physician communication: receptive communication (physician to patient); proactive communication (patient to physician); and interactive, bidirectional communication. We assessed HL and language categories including: English-speakers, Spanish-speakers with Spanish-speaking physicians (Spanish-concordant), and Spanish-speakers without Spanish-speaking physicians (Spanish-discordant). RESULTS: Overall, the mean age of participants was 56 years, 58% were women, 53% were English-speakers, 23% Spanish-concordant, 24% Spanish-discordant, and 51% had limited HL. Thirty percent reported poor receptive, 28% poor proactive, and 56% poor interactive communication. In multivariable analyses, limited HL was associated with poor receptive and proactive communication. Spanish-concordance and discordance was associated with poor interactive communication. In stratified analyses, among English-speakers, limited HL was associated with poor receptive and proactive, but not interactive communication. Among Spanish-concordant participants, limited HL was associated with poor proactive and interactive, but not receptive communication. Spanish-discordant participants reported the worst communication for all types, independent of HL. CONCLUSION: Limited health literacy impedes patient-physician communication, but its effects vary with language concordance and communication type. For language discordant dyads, language barriers may supersede limited HL in impeding interactive communication. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Patient-physician communication interventions for diverse populations need to consider HL, language concordance, and communication type.
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether the effect of health literacy (HL) on patient-physician communication varies with patient-physician language concordance and communication type. METHODS: 771 outpatients rated three types of patient-physician communication: receptive communication (physician to patient); proactive communication (patient to physician); and interactive, bidirectional communication. We assessed HL and language categories including: English-speakers, Spanish-speakers with Spanish-speaking physicians (Spanish-concordant), and Spanish-speakers without Spanish-speaking physicians (Spanish-discordant). RESULTS: Overall, the mean age of participants was 56 years, 58% were women, 53% were English-speakers, 23% Spanish-concordant, 24% Spanish-discordant, and 51% had limited HL. Thirty percent reported poor receptive, 28% poor proactive, and 56% poor interactive communication. In multivariable analyses, limited HL was associated with poor receptive and proactive communication. Spanish-concordance and discordance was associated with poor interactive communication. In stratified analyses, among English-speakers, limited HL was associated with poor receptive and proactive, but not interactive communication. Among Spanish-concordant participants, limited HL was associated with poor proactive and interactive, but not receptive communication. Spanish-discordant participants reported the worst communication for all types, independent of HL. CONCLUSION: Limited health literacy impedes patient-physician communication, but its effects vary with language concordance and communication type. For language discordant dyads, language barriers may supersede limited HL in impeding interactive communication. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Patient-physician communication interventions for diverse populations need to consider HL, language concordance, and communication type.
Authors: Hilary K Seligman; Frances F Wang; Jorge L Palacios; Clifford C Wilson; Carolyn Daher; John D Piette; Dean Schillinger Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2005-11 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Kristin A Riekert; Andrew Bilderback; Arjun Chanmugam; Peter Hill; Cynthia S Rand; Fred L Brancati; Jerry A Krishnan Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2005-08-04 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Sunil Kripalani; Terry A Jacobson; Ileko C Mugalla; Courtney R Cawthon; Kurt J Niesner; Viola Vaccarino Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2010 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Martha P Montgomery; Elizabeth D Allen; Olivia Thomas; Byron F Robinson; Donnie Clark; Ann Connelly; Joshua A Mott; Elizabeth Conrey Journal: J Asthma Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 2.515
Authors: Aqsa A Khan; Claudia Sevilla; Cecilia K Wieslander; Meghan B Moran; Rezoana Rashid; Brita Mittal; Sally L Maliski; Rebecca G Rogers; Jennifer T Anger Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2013 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.091