Whitney S Baker1, Gregory C Gray. 1. Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52241, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify published reports regarding zoonotic pathogen infection among veterinarians. DESIGN: Literature review. PROCEDURES: The PubMed electronic database of medical literature published between 1966 and November 2007 was searched. Clinical case reports and reports of outbreak investigations were also identified through searches of the literature outside of PubMed and searches of references listed in included articles. Reports eligible for inclusion included controlled and uncontrolled studies examining seroprevalence of animal pathogens in veterinarians, serosurveys involving veterinarians, and reports of zoonotic pathogen infections causing clinical illness. RESULTS: 66 relevant articles were identified. This included 44 seroepidemiologic studies (some examined > 1 pathogen), 12 case reports, 3 outbreak investigations, and 7 self-reported surveys (including 4 related to personal protective equipment use). Of the 44 seroepidemiologic studies, 37 (84%) identified an increased risk of zoonotic pathogen infection among veterinarians, and 7 (16%) identified no increased risk or a decreased risk. Surveys also documented that veterinarians often failed to use recommended personal protective equipment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our review indicated that veterinarians had an increased risk of infection with a number of zoonotic pathogens. It also suggested that veterinarians may inadvertently serve as biological sentinels for emerging pathogens and could potentially spread zoonotic pathogens to their families, community members, and the animals for which they provide care. Professional and policy measures should be implemented to reduce the risk that veterinarians will become infected with, or transmit, zoonotic pathogens.
OBJECTIVE: To identify published reports regarding zoonotic pathogen infection among veterinarians. DESIGN: Literature review. PROCEDURES: The PubMed electronic database of medical literature published between 1966 and November 2007 was searched. Clinical case reports and reports of outbreak investigations were also identified through searches of the literature outside of PubMed and searches of references listed in included articles. Reports eligible for inclusion included controlled and uncontrolled studies examining seroprevalence of animal pathogens in veterinarians, serosurveys involving veterinarians, and reports of zoonotic pathogen infections causing clinical illness. RESULTS: 66 relevant articles were identified. This included 44 seroepidemiologic studies (some examined > 1 pathogen), 12 case reports, 3 outbreak investigations, and 7 self-reported surveys (including 4 related to personal protective equipment use). Of the 44 seroepidemiologic studies, 37 (84%) identified an increased risk of zoonotic pathogen infection among veterinarians, and 7 (16%) identified no increased risk or a decreased risk. Surveys also documented that veterinarians often failed to use recommended personal protective equipment. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our review indicated that veterinarians had an increased risk of infection with a number of zoonotic pathogens. It also suggested that veterinarians may inadvertently serve as biological sentinels for emerging pathogens and could potentially spread zoonotic pathogens to their families, community members, and the animals for which they provide care. Professional and policy measures should be implemented to reduce the risk that veterinarians will become infected with, or transmit, zoonotic pathogens.
Authors: Cara C Cherry; María E Negrón Sureda; John D Gibbins; Christa R Hale; G Sean Stapleton; Emma S Jones; Megin C Nichols Journal: J Am Vet Med Assoc Date: 2022-02-16 Impact factor: 1.836
Authors: Antonio Sánchez; Miranda Prats-van der Ham; Juan Tatay-Dualde; Ana Paterna; Christian de la Fe; Ángel Gómez-Martín; Juan C Corrales; Antonio Contreras Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-01-04 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Paula A Schaffer; Stephanie A Brault; Connor Hershkowitz; Lauren Harris; Kristy Dowers; Jennifer House; Tawfik A Aboellail; Paul S Morley; Joshua B Daniels Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: David Rodríguez-Lázaro; Nigel Cook; Franco M Ruggeri; Jane Sellwood; Abid Nasser; Maria Sao Jose Nascimento; Martin D'Agostino; Ricardo Santos; Juan Carlos Saiz; Artur Rzeżutka; Albert Bosch; Rosina Gironés; Annalaura Carducci; Michelle Muscillo; Katarina Kovač; Marta Diez-Valcarce; Apostolos Vantarakis; Carl-Henrik von Bonsdorff; Ana Maria de Roda Husman; Marta Hernández; Wim H M van der Poel Journal: FEMS Microbiol Rev Date: 2011-10-24 Impact factor: 16.408