OBJECTIVE: Although cancer patients from Western countries have high needs for prognostic information, the frequency of such discussions in oncology consultations is variable. Prognosis is a difficult discussion area for both physicians and patients. Physician focused Communication Skills Training (CST) has been suggested as a means to aid these discussions. We developed and tested a CST module about discussing prognosis. Training consisted of didactic teaching, exemplary video and role-play sessions. The study aim was to develop the module and evaluate the effectiveness of the training. METHOD: One hundred and forty-two clinicians from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the New York City area voluntarily participated in the training module over a two-year period. The module was based on current literature and followed the Comskil model previously utilized for other doctor-patient CSTs. Participants completed pre and post surveys to evaluate their own confidence as well as the helpfulness of the module. RESULTS: Based on a retrospective pre-post measure, participants reported an increase in their confidence about discussing prognosis (t(141)=-9.331, p<0.001). At least 92% of participants reported their satisfaction with components of the module by either agreeing or strongly agreeing with 5/6 different statements included in their evaluation forms. CONCLUSIONS: This short training program demonstrated success in improving physician confidence to discuss prognosis and self-efficacy. This result, coupled with the participant's intent to utilize new skills in clinical encounters, suggests that this is a useful module. Future research will target changes in patient outcomes as a result of the physician training. Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: Although cancerpatients from Western countries have high needs for prognostic information, the frequency of such discussions in oncology consultations is variable. Prognosis is a difficult discussion area for both physicians and patients. Physician focused Communication Skills Training (CST) has been suggested as a means to aid these discussions. We developed and tested a CST module about discussing prognosis. Training consisted of didactic teaching, exemplary video and role-play sessions. The study aim was to develop the module and evaluate the effectiveness of the training. METHOD: One hundred and forty-two clinicians from Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and the New York City area voluntarily participated in the training module over a two-year period. The module was based on current literature and followed the Comskil model previously utilized for other doctor-patient CSTs. Participants completed pre and post surveys to evaluate their own confidence as well as the helpfulness of the module. RESULTS: Based on a retrospective pre-post measure, participants reported an increase in their confidence about discussing prognosis (t(141)=-9.331, p<0.001). At least 92% of participants reported their satisfaction with components of the module by either agreeing or strongly agreeing with 5/6 different statements included in their evaluation forms. CONCLUSIONS: This short training program demonstrated success in improving physician confidence to discuss prognosis and self-efficacy. This result, coupled with the participant's intent to utilize new skills in clinical encounters, suggests that this is a useful module. Future research will target changes in patient outcomes as a result of the physician training. Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Carma L Bylund; Smita C Banerjee; Philip A Bialer; Ruth Manna; Tomer T Levin; Patricia A Parker; Elizabeth Schofield; Yuelin Li; Abraham Bartell; Alexander Chou; Shira A Hichenberg; Maura Dickler; David W Kissane Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2018-06-01
Authors: Robert Gramling; Sally Norton; Susan Ladwig; Paul Winters; Maureen Metzger; Timothy Quill; Stewart Alexander Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2013-05-09 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Thomas A D'Agostino; Philip A Bialer; Chasity B Walters; Aileen R Killen; Hrafn O Sigurdsson; Patricia A Parker Journal: AORN J Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 0.676
Authors: Kelly M Trevino; Holly G Prigerson; Megan Johnson Shen; Daniel J Tancredi; Guibo Xing; Michael Hoerger; Ronald M Epstein; Paul R Duberstein Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-05-30 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Stewart C Alexander; Amy M Sullivan; Anthony L Back; James A Tulsky; Roberta E Goldman; Susan D Block; Susan K Stewart; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Stephanie J Lee Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Kelly M Trevino; Charlotte Healy; Peter Martin; Beverly Canin; Karl Pillemer; Jo Anne Sirey; M Cary Reid Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Madison B Smith; Tamara G R Macieira; Michael D Bumbach; Susan J Garbutt; Sandra W Citty; Anita Stephen; Margaret Ansell; Toni L Glover; Gail Keenan Journal: Am J Hosp Palliat Care Date: 2018-03-08 Impact factor: 2.500
Authors: Piotr Przymuszała; Patrycja Marciniak-Stępak; Magdalena Cerbin-Koczorowska; Martyna Borowczyk; Katarzyna Cieślak; Lidia Szlanga; Łucja Zielińska-Tomczak; Ryszard Marciniak Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-27 Impact factor: 3.390