Literature DB >> 19440665

[Training in radiation oncology in Germany. Current status and necessary developments].

Tobias Bölling1, Heinrich Seegenschmiedt, Robert Semrau, Claus Rödel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: A sufficient number of well-trained specialists in radiation oncology is needed for an adequate supply in radiation oncology. Therefore, the training in radiation oncology is of utmost importance. This requirement is faced with a growing lack of physicians in Germany. The aim of this study was to characterize the current situation of radiation oncology training in Germany and to work out proposals to avoid a lack of radiotherapists.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: In summer 2008, 233 questionnaires were sent out to potential trainers in radiation oncology in Germany. The questions included, among others, the individual training situation and problems in finding physicians. A second questionnaire was addressed to trainees in radiation oncology and contained, e.g., questions regarding satisfaction, motivation for the choice of radiation oncology, a previous work in another discipline, and future perspectives.
RESULTS: Answers were obtained from 107 supervisor physicians of whom 84.1% had the permission to employ trainees in radiation oncology. The finding of new trainees provided large problems in 47.1%; 35.3% had few and 17.6% no problems. For specialists in radiation oncology, 47.2% reported large, 26.4% few and 26.4% no problems in finding candidates. 113 trainees answered the questionnaires. Almost half of them (46.9%) had previously worked in another discipline. The majority was quite (44.2%) or fully (46.0%) satisfied with their job, 84.1% stated good up to excellent future perspectives. The vast majority (88.5%) would decide for a training in radiation oncology again.
CONCLUSION: Trainees in radiation oncology in Germany are satisfied with their training, see good future perspectives and would again decide to do their training in radiation oncology. However, there are large problems in finding candidates for open jobs. A positive promotion is recommended to face these problems.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19440665     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-009-2003-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  7 in total

1.  Training logbook for radiotherapy.

Authors:  Robin D Hunter; Boguslaw Maciejewski; Jan Willem Leer; Munir Kinay; Germaine Heeren
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  [Radiation oncology training in France: demography, analysis of motivations of the young specialists, evaluation of the training].

Authors:  G Kantor; F Huguet; A Toledano; C Lafond; L Quero; S Servagi; J P Gérard; P Bey
Journal:  Cancer Radiother       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 1.018

3.  The effectiveness of the Ivan H. Smith Memorial Studentships program on encouraging medical students to pursue a career in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Kate Barrett; Nisha Mistry; Charles Hayter; Peter Poldre; Marilynne Henry; Sandra Gardner
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Quality of training in radiation oncology in Germany. Results of a 2006 survey.

Authors:  Robert Semrau; Katja Hansemann; Markus Adam; Nicolaus Andratschke; Thomas Brunner; Frank Heinzelmann; Guido Hildebrandt; Dirk Vordermark; Daniel Zips
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Longitudinal assessment of parotid function in patients receiving tomotherapy for head-and-neck cancer.

Authors:  Mia Voordeckers; Hendrik Everaert; Koen Tournel; Dirk Verellen; Ilan Baron; Gretel Van Esch; Chris Vanhove; Guy Storme
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  CT-guided interstitial brachytherapy of primary and secondary lung malignancies: results of a prospective phase II trial.

Authors:  Nils Peters; Gero Wieners; Maciej Pech; Susanne Hengst; Ricarda Rühl; Florian Streitparth; Enrique Lopez Hänninen; Roland Felix; Peter Wust; Jens Ricke
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Helical tomotherapy as a new treatment technique for whole abdominal irradiation.

Authors:  Nathalie Rochet; Florian Sterzing; Alexandra Jensen; Julien Dinkel; Klaus Herfarth; Kai Schubert; Michael Eichbaum; Andreas Schneeweiss; Christof Sohn; Juergen Debus; Wolfgang Harms
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.621

  7 in total
  3 in total

1.  [Survey of potential improvements during the course of the radiotherapy treatment--a patient questionnaire].

Authors:  Felix Momm; David Jooss; Carola J Xander; Sonja Adebahr; Viola Duncker-Rohr; Felix Heinemann; Simon Kirste; Marc-Benjamin Messmer; Anca-Ligia Grosu; Gerhild Becker
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Situation of young radiation oncologists, medical physicists and radiation biologists in German-speaking countries : Results from a web-based survey of the Young DEGRO working group.

Authors:  David Krug; Rene Baumann; Thorsten Rieckmann; Emmanouil Fokas; Tobias Gauer; Maximilian Niyazi
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Current status and developments of German curriculum-based residency training programmes in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Hans Christiansen; Maximilian Niyazi; Marcel Büttner; Nils Cordes; Tobias Gauer; Daniel Habermehl; Gunther Klautke; Oliver Micke; Matthias Mäurer; Jan Sokoll; Esther Gera Cornelia Troost
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.481

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.