Literature DB >> 19440660

Cancer genetics service interest in women with a limited family history of breast cancer.

Tamara J Somers1, Julie C Michael, William M P Klein, Andrew Baum.   

Abstract

Women with a limited family history of breast cancer may be interested in cancer genetics information although their objective risk of breast cancer may not indicate routine referral to cancer genetics services. This study examined factors related to interest and use of cancer genetics services in a community sample of women with a limited family history of breast cancer (N = 187) who had no previous contact with cancer genetics services. Participants provided demographic information and ratings of perceived risk, cancer distress, attitudes, and intentions to initiate cancer genetics services. Participants were given information about a cancer genetics clinic that served women having concerns about their breast cancer risk. Women were contacted within 6 weeks and 8 months following their study appointment. Six weeks following their study appointment, 25% of women had initiated cancer genetics services. Eight months following their study appointment, 18% of women reported having completed a cancer genetics service appointment. Baseline intentions independently predicted both initiation at 6 weeks and appointment at 8 months. Cancer distress was positively associated with cancer genetics service initiation and appointment. Results suggest that some women with a limited family history of breast cancer are interested in seeking out cancer genetics information. Women with a limited family history of breast cancer may benefit from the availability of cancer genetics information provided through primary healthcare settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19440660     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9224-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  44 in total

Review 1.  Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Breast cancer risk reduction options: awareness, discussion, and use among women from four ethnic groups.

Authors:  Celia Patricia Kaplan; Jennifer S Haas; Eliseo J Pérez-Stable; Steven E Gregorich; Carol Somkin; Genevieve Des Jarlais; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Genetic counseling.

Authors:  F C Fraser
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Younger women at increased risk for breast cancer: perceived risk, psychological well-being, and surveillance behavior.

Authors:  C Lerman; K Kash; M Stefanek
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  1994

5.  Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study.

Authors:  Bernard Fisher; Joseph P Costantino; D Lawrence Wickerham; Reena S Cecchini; Walter M Cronin; Andre Robidoux; Therese B Bevers; Maureen T Kavanah; James N Atkins; Richard G Margolese; Carolyn D Runowicz; Joan M James; Leslie G Ford; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Participation in breast cancer risk counseling among women with a family history.

Authors:  D Bowen; A McTiernan; W Burke; D Powers; J Pruski; S Durfy; J Gralow; K Malone
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.254

7.  Unrealistic optimism and the Health Belief Model.

Authors:  V A Clarke; H Lovegrove; A Williams; M Machperson
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2000-08

8.  The relationship between perceived risk, affect, and health behaviors.

Authors:  Deborah J Bowen; Catherine M Alfano; Bonnie A McGregor; M Robyn Andersen
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  2004

9.  Evaluation of breast cancer risk assessment packages in the family history evaluation and screening programme.

Authors:  E Amir; D G Evans; A Shenton; F Lalloo; A Moran; C Boggis; M Wilson; A Howell
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Women's receptivity to testing for a genetic susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  H Chaliki; S Loader; J C Levenkron; W Logan-Young; W J Hall; P T Rowley
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  6 in total

1.  Factors associated with an individuals' decision to withdraw from genetic counseling for BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes mutations: are personality traits involved?

Authors:  Anita Caruso; Cristina Vigna; Valentina Bigazzi; Carlo Leone; Gabriella Maggi; Aline Martayan; Fabio M Sega; Francesco Cognetti; Antonella Savarese
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  Persistent breast pain in post-surgery breast cancer survivors and women with no history of breast surgery or cancer: associations with pain catastrophizing, perceived breast cancer risk, breast cancer worry, and emotional distress.

Authors:  Dana H Bovbjerg; Francis J Keefe; Mary S Soo; Jessica Manculich; Alyssa Van Denburg; Margarita L Zuley; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Celette S Skinner; Sara N Edmond; Rebecca A Shelby
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 4.089

3.  Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the Lung Cancer Screening Health Belief Scales.

Authors:  Lisa Carter-Harris; James E Slaven; Patrick Monohan; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Cancer Nurs       Date:  2017 May/Jun       Impact factor: 2.592

4.  Perceptions and Attitudes About Genetic Counseling Among Residents of a Midwestern Rural Area.

Authors:  Rachel J Riesgraf; Patricia McCarthy Veach; Ian M MacFarlane; Bonnie S LeRoy
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  A Retrospective Exploration of the Impact of the 'Angelina Jolie Effect' on the Single State-Wide Familial Cancer Program in Perth, Western Australia.

Authors:  Rebecca Freedman; Helen Mountain; Dian Karina; Lyn Schofield
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Does perceived risk predict breast cancer screening use? Findings from a prospective cohort study of female relatives from the Ontario site of the breast cancer family registry.

Authors:  Meghan J Walker; Lucia Mirea; Gord Glendon; Paul Ritvo; Irene L Andrulis; Julia A Knight; Anna M Chiarelli
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.380

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.