BACKGROUND: Infliximab's efficacy in the induction and maintenance of remission in luminal Crohn's disease has been confirmed by randomized, controlled trials. Less clearly described are long-term outcomes in the clinical practice setting since the establishment of regularly scheduled, every eight-week maintenance infliximab infusions. Existing reports describing clinical practice outcomes are limited by short durations of follow-up or by the use of episodic dosing, or focus on safety data rather than clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine induction and maintenance responses to infliximab in an outpatient inflammatory bowel disease clinic. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed. Clinical outcomes were infliximab induction and maintenance responses, defined as the ability to stop and remain off corticosteroids while not requiring additional therapy for active disease. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three patients were identified with records sufficiently detailed to be analyzed. Of these, 117 patients (88%) demonstrated a clinical response to induction; 104 of 117 (89%) were on concomitant immunosuppressive therapy; 80 of 104 on azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (77%); and 24 of 104 on methotrexate (23%). The mean duration of clinical response was 94 weeks (95% CI 78.8 to 109.2). The proportion of patients who maintained response at 30 weeks was 83.2%, at 54 weeks was 63.6% and at 108 weeks was 44.9%. Adverse events occurred for 15 of 117 patients (12.8%), consisting of nine infusion reactions, four serum sickness-like reactions, one rash and one infection. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with infliximab therapy for luminal Crohn's disease in our outpatient clinic achieved excellent induction and maintenance of response rates, confirming the real-life efficacy of maintenance infliximab established in clinical trials.
BACKGROUND:Infliximab's efficacy in the induction and maintenance of remission in luminal Crohn's disease has been confirmed by randomized, controlled trials. Less clearly described are long-term outcomes in the clinical practice setting since the establishment of regularly scheduled, every eight-week maintenance infliximab infusions. Existing reports describing clinical practice outcomes are limited by short durations of follow-up or by the use of episodic dosing, or focus on safety data rather than clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To examine induction and maintenance responses to infliximab in an outpatientinflammatory bowel disease clinic. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed. Clinical outcomes were infliximab induction and maintenance responses, defined as the ability to stop and remain off corticosteroids while not requiring additional therapy for active disease. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-three patients were identified with records sufficiently detailed to be analyzed. Of these, 117 patients (88%) demonstrated a clinical response to induction; 104 of 117 (89%) were on concomitant immunosuppressive therapy; 80 of 104 on azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (77%); and 24 of 104 on methotrexate (23%). The mean duration of clinical response was 94 weeks (95% CI 78.8 to 109.2). The proportion of patients who maintained response at 30 weeks was 83.2%, at 54 weeks was 63.6% and at 108 weeks was 44.9%. Adverse events occurred for 15 of 117 patients (12.8%), consisting of nine infusion reactions, four serum sickness-like reactions, one rash and one infection. CONCLUSION:Patients treated with infliximab therapy for luminal Crohn's disease in our outpatient clinic achieved excellent induction and maintenance of response rates, confirming the real-life efficacy of maintenance infliximab established in clinical trials.
Authors: Paul Rutgeerts; Brian G Feagan; Gary R Lichtenstein; Lloyd F Mayer; Stefan Schreiber; Jean Frederic Colombel; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Douglas C Wolf; Allan Olson; Weihang Bao; Stephen B Hanauer Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Stephen B Hanauer; Brian G Feagan; Gary R Lichtenstein; Lloyd F Mayer; S Schreiber; Jean Frederic Colombel; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Douglas C Wolf; Allan Olson; Weihang Bao; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-05-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Daan W Hommes; Brenda H van de Heisteeg; Mirjam van der Spek; Joep F W M Bartelsman; Sander J H van Deventer Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Heimo H Wenzl; Walter Reinisch; Jörg Jahnel; Felix Stockenhuber; Herbert Tilg; Andreas Kirchgatterer; Wolfgang Petritsch Journal: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 2.566
Authors: Severine Vermeire; Edouard Louis; An Carbonez; Gert Van Assche; Maja Noman; Jacques Belaiche; Martine De Vos; Andre Van Gossum; Paul Pescatore; Rene Fiasse; Paul Pelckmans; Hendrik Reynaert; Geert D'Haens; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: F Schnitzler; H Fidder; M Ferrante; M Noman; I Arijs; G Van Assche; I Hoffman; K Van Steen; S Vermeire; P Rutgeerts Journal: Gut Date: 2008-10-02 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Jean-Frederic Colombel; Edward V Loftus; William J Tremaine; Laurence J Egan; W Scott Harmsen; Cathy D Schleck; Alan R Zinsmeister; William J Sandborn Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Bruce E Sands; Frank H Anderson; Charles N Bernstein; William Y Chey; Brian G Feagan; Richard N Fedorak; Michael A Kamm; Joshua R Korzenik; Bret A Lashner; Jane E Onken; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Paul Rutgeerts; Gary Wild; Douglas C Wolf; Paul A Marsters; Suzanne B Travers; Marion A Blank; Sander J van Deventer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-02-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Diana M Negoescu; Eva A Enns; Brooke Swanhorst; Bonnie Baumgartner; James P Campbell; Mark T Osterman; Konstantinos Papamichael; Adam S Cheifetz; Byron P Vaughn Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Seung Wook Hong; Jaewoo Park; Hyuk Yoon; Hye Ran Yang; Cheol Min Shin; Young Soo Park; Nayoung Kim; Dong Ho Lee; Joo Sung Kim Journal: Korean J Intern Med Date: 2020-06-25 Impact factor: 2.884