Literature DB >> 19440259

Alternate row placement is ineffective for cultural control of Meloidogyne incognita in cotton.

Richard F Davis1.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine if planting cotton into the space between the previous year's rows reduces crop loss due to Meloidogyne incognita compared to planting in the same row every year. Row placement had a significant (P </= 0.05) effect on nematode population levels only on 8 July 2005. Plots receiving 1,3-dichloropropene plus aldicarb had lower nematode population levels than non-fumigated plots on 24 May and 8 July in 2005, but not in 2004. The effect of nematicide treatment on nematode populations was not affected by row placement. Row placement did not have a significant effect on root galling or yield in 2004 or 2005. Nematicide treatment decreased root galling in all years, and the decrease was not influenced by row placement. Yield was increased by nematicide application in 2004 and 2005, and the increase was not affected by row placement. Percentage yield loss was not affected by row placement. Changing the placement of rows reduced nematode population levels only on one sampling date in one year, but end-of-season root galling and lint yield were not affected by changing the placement of rows, nor was the effect of fumigation on yield influenced by row placement. Therefore, row placement is unlikely to contribute to M. incognita management in cotton.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gossypium hirsutum; Meloidogyne incognita; cotton; cultural control; nematode management; root-knot nematode; row placement

Year:  2008        PMID: 19440259      PMCID: PMC2664669     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nematol        ISSN: 0022-300X            Impact factor:   1.402


  9 in total

1.  The future of nematode management in cotton.

Authors:  J L Starr; S R Koenning; T L Kirkpatrick; A F Robinson; P A Roberts; R L Nichols
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.402

2.  Reniform nematode resistance in selected soybean cultivars.

Authors:  R T Robbins; L Rakes; L E Jackson; D G Dombek
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.402

3.  Response of Rotylenchulus reniformis to Nematicide Applications on Cotton.

Authors:  G W Lawrence; K S McLean; W E Batson; D Miller; J C Borbon
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.402

4.  Resistance in Selected Corn Hybrids to Meloidogyne arenaria and M. incognita.

Authors:  R F Davis; P Timper
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.402

5.  Tolerance of Selected Cotton Lines to Rotylenchulus reniformis.

Authors:  S R Koenning; K R Barker; D T Bowman
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.402

6.  Rotylenchulus reniformis Management in Cotton with Crop Rotation.

Authors:  R F Davis; S R Koenning; R C Kemerait; T D Cummings; W D Shurley
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.402

7.  Host suitability in soybean cultivars for the reniform nematode, 2000 tests.

Authors:  R T Robbins; L Rakes; L E Jackson; E E Gbur; D G Dombek
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.402

Review 8.  Reniform in U.S. cotton: when, where, why, and some remedies.

Authors:  A Forest Robinson
Journal:  Annu Rev Phytopathol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.078

9.  Reproduction of Meloidogyne incognita on Winter Cover Crops Used in Cotton Production.

Authors:  Patricia Timper; Richard F Davis; P Glynn Tillman
Journal:  J Nematol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 1.402

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.