Literature DB >> 19439915

When is a genetic test suitable for prime time? Predicting the risk of prostate cancer as a case-example.

A Li-Wan-Po1, P Farndon, C Cooley, J Lithgow.   

Abstract

Advances in genomics promise to deliver personalized medicine both for prevention and treatment of disease. Considerable effort is being directed towards translating observed associations between various genetic variants, such as single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), and disease or drug response into clinically useful genetic tests. Unfortunately, because reported associations are usually weak or moderate, tests based on them are generally not accurate enough for use in routine clinical practice, and therefore, ensuring the appropriate use of genetic tests is important. In a recent report, a combination of 5 SNPs was claimed to improve the predictive value of the test for prostate cancer, compared with the individual SNPs. This led the authors to suggest that a 5-SNP-test could be used to predict the risk of prostate cancer. We evaluate the characteristics of the proposed test, comment on it, and summarize the views of others on its potential clinical utility. We hope that this may serve as a case-example for the evaluation of the many new genetic tests being suggested for adoption.
Copyright © 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19439915     DOI: 10.1159/000218710

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Genomics        ISSN: 1662-4246            Impact factor:   2.000


  3 in total

1.  Integrating pharmacogenetics and therapeutic drug monitoring: optimal dosing of imatinib as a case-example.

Authors:  Alain Li-Wan-Po; Peter Farndon; Charles Craddock; Michael Griffiths
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 2.953

2.  Testing for the recurrent HOXB13 G84E germline mutation in men with clinical indications for prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Florian R Schroeck; Kimberly A Zuhlke; Javed Siddiqui; Rabia Siddiqui; Kathleen A Cooney; John T Wei
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-10-02       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Update on Screening for Urological Malignancies.

Authors:  Azik Hoffman; Elizabeth E Half
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2017-10-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.