Literature DB >> 19439397

The testing effect and the retention interval: questions and answers.

Thomas C Toppino1, Michael S Cohen.   

Abstract

People learn from tests. Providing tests often enhances retention more than additional study opportunities, but is this testing effect mediated by processes related to retrieval that are fundamentally different from study processes? Some previous studies have reported that testing enhances retention relative to additional studying, but only after a relatively long retention interval. To the extent that this interaction with retention interval dissociates the effects of studying and testing, it may provide crucial evidence for different underlying processes. However, these findings can be questioned because of methodological differences between the study and the test conditions. In two experiments, we eliminated or minimized the confounds that rendered the previous findings equivocal and still obtained the critical interaction. Our results strengthen the evidence for the involvement of different processes underlying the effects of studying and testing, and support the hypothesis that the testing effect is grounded in retrieval-related processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19439397     DOI: 10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Psychol        ISSN: 1618-3169


  28 in total

1.  Decomposing the interaction between retention interval and study/test practice: the role of retrievability.

Authors:  Yoonhee Jang; John T Wixted; Diane Pecher; René Zeelenberg; David E Huber
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2012-02-03       Impact factor: 2.143

2.  Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Bernhard Pastötter; Karl-Heinz T Bäuml
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  How crucial is the response format for the testing effect?

Authors:  Fredrik U Jönsson; Veit Kubik; Max Larsson Sundqvist; Ivo Todorov; Bert Jonsson
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-10-31

4.  Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis.

Authors:  Katherine A Rawson; Kalif E Vaughn; Shana K Carpenter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2015-05

5.  Adding the keyword mnemonic to retrieval practice: A potent combination for foreign language vocabulary learning?

Authors:  Toshiya Miyatsu; Mark A McDaniel
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-10

6.  Testing the primary and convergent retrieval model of recall: Recall practice produces faster recall success but also faster recall failure.

Authors:  William J Hopper; David E Huber
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-05

Review 7.  A dual memory theory of the testing effect.

Authors:  Timothy C Rickard; Steven C Pan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-06

8.  Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.

Authors:  Thomas C Toppino; Melissa H LaVan; Ryan T Iaconelli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2018-10

9.  Retrieval-based skill learning: testing promotes the acquisition of scientific experimentation skills.

Authors:  Tobias Tempel; Katrin Kaufmann; Johanna Kranz; Andrea Möller
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-08-31

10.  The effects of interleaving versus blocking on foreign language pronunciation learning.

Authors:  Shana K Carpenter; Frank E Mueller
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.