Literature DB >> 19438761

Evolution of M1 crown size and cusp proportions in the genus Homo.

Rolf Quam1, Shara Bailey, Bernard Wood.   

Abstract

Previous research into tooth crown dimensions and cusp proportions has proved to be a useful way to identify taxonomic differences in Pliocene and Pleistocene fossil hominins. The present study has identified changes in both M(1) crown size and cusp proportions within the genus Homo, with M(1) overall crown size reduction apparently occurring in two main stages. The first stage (a reduction of ca. 17%) is associated with the emergence of Homo ergaster and Homo erectus sensu stricto. The second stage (a reduction of ca. 10%) occurs in Homo sapiens, but the reduced modern human M(1) tooth crown size was only attained in Upper Paleolithic times. The absolute sizes of the individual cusps are highly positively correlated with overall crown size and dental reduction produces a reduction in the absolute size of each of the cusps. Most of the individual cusps scale isometrically with crown size, but the paracone shows a negative allometric relationship, indicating that the reduction in paracone size is less than in the other M(1) cusps. Thus, the phylogenetically oldest cusp in the upper molars also seems to be the most stable cusp (at least in the M(1)). The most striking change in M(1) cusp proportions is a change in the relative size of the areas of the paracone and metacone. The combination of a small relative paracone and a large relative metacone generally characterizes specimens attributed to early Homo, and the presence of this character state in Australopithecus and Paranthropus suggests it may represent the primitive condition for the later part of the hominin clade. In contrast, nearly all later Homo taxa, with the exception of Homo antecessor, show the opposite condition (i.e. a relatively large paracone and a relatively small metacone). This change in the relationship between the relative sizes of the paracone and metacone is related to an isometric reduction of the absolute size of the metacone. This metacone reduction occurs in the context of relative stability in the paracone as crown size decreases. Among later Homo taxa, both Homo heidelbergensis and Homo neanderthalensis show a further reduction of the metacone and an enlargement of the hypocone. Fossil and contemporary H. sapiens samples show a trend toward increasing the relative size of the protocone and decreasing the relative size of the hypocone. In Europe, modern human M(1) cusp proportions are essentially reached during the Upper Paleolithic. Although some variation was documented among the fossil taxa, we suggest that the relative size of the M(1) paracone and metacone areas may be useful for differentiating the earliest members of our genus from subsequent Homo species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19438761      PMCID: PMC2707090          DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2009.01064.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  36 in total

1.  New Neandertal remains from Cova Negra (Valencia, Spain).

Authors:  J L Arsuaga; V Villaverde; R Quam; I Martínez; J M Carretero; C Lorenzo; A Gracia
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 3.895

2.  Hominin lower second premolar morphology: evolutionary inferences through geometric morphometric analysis.

Authors:  M Martinón-Torres; M Bastir; J M Bermúdez de Castro; A Gómez; S Sarmiento; A Muela; J L Arsuaga
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2006-02-10       Impact factor: 3.895

3.  Implications of new early Homo fossils from Ileret, east of Lake Turkana, Kenya.

Authors:  F Spoor; M G Leakey; P N Gathogo; F H Brown; S C Antón; I McDougall; C Kiarie; F K Manthi; L N Leakey
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Geometric morphometric analysis of the crown morphology of the lower first premolar of hominins, with special attention to Pleistocene Homo.

Authors:  Aida Gómez-Robles; María Martinón-Torres; José María Bermúdez de Castro; Leyre Prado; Susana Sarmiento; Juan Luis Arsuaga
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2008-07-21       Impact factor: 3.895

Review 5.  Human evolution: taxonomy and paleobiology.

Authors:  B Wood; B G Richmond
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 6.  The human chin revisited: what is it and who has it?

Authors:  J H Schwartz; I Tattersall
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.895

7.  Dental remains from Atapuerca-TD6 (Gran Dolina site, Burgos, Spain).

Authors:  J M Bermúdez de Castro; A Rosas; M E Nicolás
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  1999 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.895

8.  Identifying metameric variation in extant hominoid and fossil hominid mandibular molars.

Authors:  Leslea J Hlusko
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.868

9.  Diagnostic differences in mandibular P4 shape between Neandertals and anatomically modern humans.

Authors:  Shara E Bailey; John M Lynch
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  A geometric morphometric analysis of hominin upper first molar shape.

Authors:  A Gómez-Robles; M Martinón-Torres; J M Bermúdez de Castro; A Margvelashvili; M Bastir; J L Arsuaga; A Pérez-Pérez; F Estebaranz; L M Martínez
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.895

View more
  11 in total

1.  Shape covariation between the craniofacial complex and first molars in humans.

Authors:  Georgios Polychronis; Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Crown size and cusp proportions in Homo antecessor upper first molars. A comment on Quam et al. 2009.

Authors:  Aida Gómez-Robles; José María Bermúdez de Castro; María Martinón-Torres; Leyre Prado-Simón
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  The earliest unequivocally modern humans in southern China.

Authors:  Wu Liu; María Martinón-Torres; Yan-jun Cai; Song Xing; Hao-wen Tong; Shu-wen Pei; Mark Jan Sier; Xiao-hong Wu; R Lawrence Edwards; Hai Cheng; Yi-yuan Li; Xiong-xin Yang; José María Bermúdez de Castro; Xiu-jie Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Elastic Properties of Chimpanzee Craniofacial Cortical Bone.

Authors:  Poorva Gharpure; Elias D Kontogiorgos; Lynne A Opperman; Callum F Ross; David S Strait; Amanda Smith; Leslie C Pryor; Qian Wang; Paul C Dechow
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.064

5.  Genetic influences on dentognathic morphology in the Jirel population of Nepal.

Authors:  Anna M Hardin; Ryan P Knigge; Dana L Duren; Sarah Williams-Blangero; Janardan Subedi; Michael C Mahaney; Richard J Sherwood
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.227

6.  Morphometric analysis of molars in a Middle Pleistocene population shows a mosaic of 'modern' and Neanderthal features.

Authors:  María Martinón-Torres; Petra Spěváčková; Ana Gracia-Téllez; Ignacio Martínez; Emiliano Bruner; Juan Luis Arsuaga; José María Bermúdez de Castro
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Genetic integration of molar cusp size variation in baboons.

Authors:  Christina Koh; Elizabeth Bates; Elizabeth Broughton; Nicholas T Do; Zachary Fletcher; Michael C Mahaney; Leslea J Hlusko
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.868

8.  Genetic contributions to dental dimensions in brown-mantled tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis) and rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Anna M Hardin
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  The Taxonomic and Phylogenetic Affinities of Bunopithecus sericus, a Fossil Hylobatid from the Pleistocene of China.

Authors:  Alejandra Ortiz; Varsha Pilbrow; Catalina I Villamil; Jessica G Korsgaard; Shara E Bailey; Terry Harrison
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  First early hominin from central Africa (Ishango, Democratic Republic of Congo).

Authors:  Isabelle Crevecoeur; Matthew M Skinner; Shara E Bailey; Philipp Gunz; Silvia Bortoluzzi; Alison S Brooks; Christian Burlet; Els Cornelissen; Nora De Clerck; Bruno Maureille; Patrick Semal; Yves Vanbrabant; Bernard Wood
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.