Literature DB >> 19438640

Inaccuracy of routine susceptibility tests for detection of erythromycin resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli.

M T van der Beek1, E C J Claas, D J Mevius, W van Pelt, J A Wagenaar, E J Kuijper.   

Abstract

In The Netherlands, both an increase in and regional differences in erythromycin resistance of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli have been reported. To determine the accuracy of routine tests for erythromycin resistance, 48 erythromycin-resistant isolates from various laboratories that participate in the Dutch surveillance of Campylobacter infections were reinvestigated. Initial susceptibility testing for erythromycin had been performed by disk diffusion in six and MIC-based methods in two laboratories. Reinvestigation was carried out using broth microdilution as a reference standard, as well as E-test and genetic resistance testing. Of 36 C. jejuni isolates reported by the initial laboratories as erythromycin-resistant, four (11%) and five (14%) were confirmed as erythromycin-resistant using broth microdilution according to CLSI and EUCAST resistance criteria, respectively. Erythromycin resistance was found in eight of 12 (67%) C. coli isolates according to both criteria. Results of E-tests were in accordance with these results in all isolates. Resistance-associated mutations in the 23S rRNA gene (A2059G and A2058T) were found in all isolates showing high-level resistance, whereas none were found in susceptible isolates. Routine determination of the erythromycin resistance of C. jejuni and C. coli shows unacceptable interlaboratory variation. In the absence of standardized protocols and interpretive criteria for disk diffusion, and while we await the development of easily applicable and reliable methods for molecular resistance testing, the use of broth microdilution remains the best method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19438640     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02755.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  8 in total

1.  Inaccuracy of the disk diffusion method compared with the agar dilution method for susceptibility testing of Campylobacter spp.

Authors:  Mirva Lehtopolku; Pirkko Kotilainen; Pauli Puukka; Ulla-Maija Nakari; Anja Siitonen; Erkki Eerola; Pentti Huovinen; Antti J Hakanen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Reply to "disk diffusion method for erythromycin and ciprofloxacin susceptibility testing of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli".

Authors:  Mirva Lehtopolku; Pirkko Kotilainen; Pauli Puukka; Ulla-Maija Nakari; Anja Siitonen; Erkki Eerola; Pentti Huovinen; Antti J Hakanen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Prevalence and Antimicrobial Resistance of Campylobacter Isolated from Dressed Beef Carcasses and Raw Milk in Tanzania.

Authors:  Isaac P Kashoma; Issmat I Kassem; Julius John; Beda M Kessy; Wondwossen Gebreyes; Rudovick R Kazwala; Gireesh Rajashekara
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.431

4.  PFGE, Lior serotype, and antimicrobial resistance patterns among Campylobacter jejuni isolated from travelers and US military personnel with acute diarrhea in Thailand, 1998-2003.

Authors:  Oralak Serichantalergs; Piyarat Pootong; Anders Dalsgaard; Ladaporn Bodhidatta; Patricia Guerry; David R Tribble; Sinn Anuras; Carl J Mason
Journal:  Gut Pathog       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 4.181

Review 5.  Campylobacter jejuni bacteremia and Helicobacter pylori in a patient with X-linked agammaglobulinemia.

Authors:  T van den Bruele; P E C Mourad-Baars; E C J Claas; R N van der Plas; E J Kuijper; R G M Bredius
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-06-17       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Antimicrobial Resistance, FlaA Sequencing, and Phylogenetic Analysis of Campylobacter Isolates from Broiler Chicken Flocks in Greece.

Authors:  George Natsos; Niki K Mouttotou; Emmanouil Magiorkinis; Anastasios Ioannidis; Maria Magana; Stylianos Chatzipanagiotou; Konstantinos C Koutoulis
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2021-04-21

7.  Campylobacter antimicrobial resistance in Peru: a ten-year observational study.

Authors:  Simon Pollett; Claudio Rocha; Rito Zerpa; Lilian Patiño; Augusto Valencia; Máximo Camiña; José Guevara; Martha Lopez; Nancy Chuquiray; Eduardo Salazar-Lindo; Carlos Calampa; Martín Casapia; Rina Meza; Maruja Bernal; Drake Tilley; Michael Gregory; Ryan Maves; Eric Hall; Franca Jones; C Sofia Arriola; Marieke Rosenbaum; Juan Perez; Matthew Kasper
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08-16       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Antimicrobial susceptibility of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli: comparison between Etest and a broth dilution method.

Authors:  Maya Azrad; Linda Tkhawkho; Natalia Isakovich; Orna Nitzan; Avi Peretz
Journal:  Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 3.944

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.