K Gauthaman1, N Manasi, A Bongso. 1. Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Statins inhibit proliferation of various human cancer cell lines in vitro. As human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) possess neoplastic-like properties we have evaluated the role of various statins on karyotypically normal hESCs (HES3 and BG01), abnormal hESCs (BG01V) and breast adenocarcinoma cells (MCF-7) to evaluate whether the mode of action of the statins was via a stemness pathway. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: All cell lines were treated with simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin and mevastatin (1 micromol x L(-1) to 20 micromol x L(-1)) up to 7 days and their effects on cell proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis and pluripotency studied. KEY RESULTS: All four statins did not inhibit HES3 and BG01 proliferation, but BG01V and MCF-7 were inhibited by simvastatin, lovastatin and mevastatin. These inhibitory effects were reversed by the endogenous isoprenoids, farnesylpyrophosphate and geranylgeranylpyrophosphate. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase biotin-dUTP nick end labelling and cell cycle assay confirmed apoptosis in BG01V and MCF-7. Stem cell surface markers [stage-specific embryonic antigen-4, tumour rejection antigen-1-81, octamer-4 (OCT-4)] were expressed in HES3 and BG01, but not in BG01V cells, even after prolonged treatment with simvastatin. In BG01V and MCF-7, the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2-associated X protein genes were up-regulated, while the antiapoptotic BCL2 and SURVIVIN genes were down-regulated. Expression of the stemness-related genes namely, the growth differentiation factor-3, NANOG and OCT-4 was decreased in BG01V compared with BG01 and HES3. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Normal hESCs were resistant to prolonged exposure to statins over a range of doses, compared with BG01V and MCF-7, probably because of genetic and behavioural differences. The statins not only have anti-cancer properties but can suppress abnormal hESCs thus promoting growth of normal hESCs in vitro.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Statins inhibit proliferation of various humancancer cell lines in vitro. As human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) possess neoplastic-like properties we have evaluated the role of various statins on karyotypically normal hESCs (HES3 and BG01), abnormal hESCs (BG01V) and breast adenocarcinoma cells (MCF-7) to evaluate whether the mode of action of the statins was via a stemness pathway. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: All cell lines were treated with simvastatin, pravastatin, lovastatin and mevastatin (1 micromol x L(-1) to 20 micromol x L(-1)) up to 7 days and their effects on cell proliferation, cell cycle, apoptosis and pluripotency studied. KEY RESULTS: All four statins did not inhibit HES3 and BG01 proliferation, but BG01V and MCF-7 were inhibited by simvastatin, lovastatin and mevastatin. These inhibitory effects were reversed by the endogenous isoprenoids, farnesylpyrophosphate and geranylgeranylpyrophosphate. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferasebiotin-dUTP nick end labelling and cell cycle assay confirmed apoptosis in BG01V and MCF-7. Stem cell surface markers [stage-specific embryonic antigen-4, tumour rejection antigen-1-81, octamer-4 (OCT-4)] were expressed in HES3 and BG01, but not in BG01V cells, even after prolonged treatment with simvastatin. In BG01V and MCF-7, the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2-associated X protein genes were up-regulated, while the antiapoptotic BCL2 and SURVIVIN genes were down-regulated. Expression of the stemness-related genes namely, the growth differentiation factor-3, NANOG and OCT-4 was decreased in BG01V compared with BG01 and HES3. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Normal hESCs were resistant to prolonged exposure to statins over a range of doses, compared with BG01V and MCF-7, probably because of genetic and behavioural differences. The statins not only have anti-cancer properties but can suppress abnormal hESCs thus promoting growth of normal hESCs in vitro.
Authors: Shulamit Levenberg; Justin S Golub; Michal Amit; Joseph Itskovitz-Eldor; Robert Langer Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-03-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Caroline Happold; Thierry Gorlia; L Burt Nabors; Sara C Erridge; David A Reardon; Christine Hicking; Martin Picard; Roger Stupp; Michael Weller Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2018-02-08 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Anna Goc; Samith T Kochuparambil; Belal Al-Husein; Ahmad Al-Azayzih; Shuaib Mohammad; Payaningal R Somanath Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Anne G Lindgren; Kyle Natsuhara; E Tian; John J Vincent; Xinmin Li; Jing Jiao; Hong Wu; Utpal Banerjee; Amander T Clark Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Stephanie M J Fliedner; Tobias Engel; Nikoletta K Lendvai; Uma Shankavaram; Svenja Nölting; Robert Wesley; Abdel G Elkahloun; Hendrik Ungefroren; Angela Oldoerp; Gary Lampert; Hendrik Lehnert; Henri Timmers; Karel Pacak Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 3.240