Literature DB >> 19438443

The insignificance of personal identity for bioethics.

David Shoemaker1.   

Abstract

It has long been thought that certain key bioethical views depend heavily on work in personal identity theory, regarding questions of either our essence or the conditions of our numerical identity across time. In this paper I argue to the contrary, that personal identity is actually not significant at all in this arena. Specifically, I explore three topics where considerations of identity are thought to be essential - abortion, definition of death, and advance directives - and I show in each case that the significant work is being done by a relation other than identity.
© 2009 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19438443     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01719.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  3 in total

1.  Personal identity and bioethics: the state of the art.

Authors:  David Shoemaker
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2010-08

2.  Why psychological accounts of personal identity can accept a brain death criterion and biological definition of death.

Authors:  David B Hershenov
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2019-10

3.  Demented patients and the quandaries of identity: setting the problem, advancing a proposal.

Authors:  Giovanni Boniolo
Journal:  Hist Philos Life Sci       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 1.205

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.