Experimental covalencies of the Fe-S bond for the resting low-spin and substrate-bound high-spin active site of cytochrome P450 are reported. DFT calculations on the active site indicate that one H-bonding interaction from the protein backbone is needed to reproduce the experimental values. The H-bonding to the thiolate from the backbone decreases the anisotropic pi covalency of the Fe-S bond lowering the barrier of free rotation of the exchangeable axial ligand, which is important for reactivity. The anionic axial thiolate ligand is calculated to lower the Fe(III/II) reduction potential of the active site by more than 1 V compared to a neutral imidazole ligand. About half of this derives from its covalent bonding and half from its electrostatic interaction with the oxidized Fe. This axial thiolate ligand increases the pK(a) of compound 0 (Fe(III)-hydroperoxo) favoring its protonation which promotes O-O bond heterolysis forming compound I. The reactivity of compound I is calculated to be relatively insensitive to the nature of the axial ligand due to opposing reduction potential and proton affinity contributions to the H-atom abstraction energy.
Experimental covn class="Chemical">alencies of the Fe-S bond for the resting low-spin and substrate-bound high-spin active site of cytochrome P450 are reported. DFT calculations on the active site indicate that one H-bonding interaction from the protein backbone is needed to reproduce the experimental values. The H-bonding to the thiolate from the backbone decreases the anisotropic pi covalency of the Fe-S bond lowering the barrier of free rotation of the exchangeable axial ligand, which is important for reactivity. The anionic axialthiolate ligand is calculated to lower the Fe(III/II) reduction potential of the active site by more than 1 V compared to a neutralimidazole ligand. About half of this derives from its covalent bonding and half from its electrostatic interaction with the oxidized Fe. This axialthiolate ligand increases the pK(a) of compound 0 (Fe(III)-hydroperoxo) favoring its protonation which promotes O-O bond heterolysis forming compound I. The reactivity of compound I is calculated to be relatively insensitive to the nature of the axial ligand due to opposing reduction potential and proton affinity contributions to the H-atom abstraction energy.
Authors: Jason K Yano; Francesca Blasco; Huiying Li; Rolf D Schmid; Anke Henne; Thomas L Poulos Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2002-10-24 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Santhosh Sivaramakrishnan; Hugues Ouellet; Hirotoshi Matsumura; Shenheng Guan; Pierre Moënne-Loccoz; Alma L Burlingame; Paul R Ortiz de Montellano Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Roman Davydov; Sangchoul Im; Muralidharan Shanmugam; William A Gunderson; Naw May Pearl; Brian M Hoffman; Lucy Waskell Journal: Biochemistry Date: 2016-02-03 Impact factor: 3.162
Authors: Xiaoshi Wang; Sebastian Peter; René Ullrich; Martin Hofrichter; John T Groves Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2013-07-03 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Ryan G Hadt; Ning Sun; Nicholas M Marshall; Keith O Hodgson; Britt Hedman; Yi Lu; Edward I Solomon Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Courtney M Krest; Alexey Silakov; Jonathan Rittle; Timothy H Yosca; Elizabeth L Onderko; Julio C Calixto; Michael T Green Journal: Nat Chem Date: 2015-08-03 Impact factor: 24.427
Authors: Benjamin K Leipzig; Julian A Rees; Joanna K Kowalska; Roslyn M Theisen; Matjaž Kavčič; Penny Chaau Yan Poon; Werner Kaminsky; Serena DeBeer; Eckhard Bill; Julie A Kovacs Journal: Inorg Chem Date: 2018-02-07 Impact factor: 5.436