Literature DB >> 19438149

In-hospital cardiac arrest: factors in the decision not to resuscitate. The impact of an organized in-hospital emergency system.

Antonio Mendes1, Flávia Carvalho, Cláudia Dias, Cristina Granja.   

Abstract

AIM: To identify factors associated with "do-not-resuscitate" (DNR) decisions in patients who suffer cardiac arrest.
METHODS: Hospital Pedro Hispano has an emergency system based on broad preset criteria of physiologic instability, which include airway compromise, bradypnea or tachypnea, bradycardia or tachycardia sustained hypotension, sudden loss of consciousness, decrease in the Glasgow coma scale, repeated and prolonged seizures, respiratory arrest and cardiac arrest. This retrospective study is based on data collected between January 2002 and August 2006. Variables studied included demographic characteristics (age and gender), comorbidities (neurological, cardiac and chronic renal disease, AIDS and cancer, classified as mild, moderate or severe), cardiac arrest variables (measures initiated before arrival of the medical emergency team [MET], including none, venous line, intravenous medication, endotracheal tube, manual ventilation, chest compressions, and external pacemaker; cause of cardiac arrest, classified as cardiac or noncardiac; and initial rhythm of cardiac arrest as shockable or non-shockable). Comparisons were made between the group of patients in which cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed and the group in which CPR was not performed.
RESULTS: There were 649 MET calls, of which 227 were for cardiac arrest. In 91 of these patients CPR was not started or was stopped. Twenty-two (24%) of these patients had a DNR order in their clinical records, in 18 (20%) CPR was not started because it was considered futile, and in 47 (52%) CPR was stopped for the same reason. Age, cancer, and no measures having been initiated before arrival of the MET were significantly associated with the DNR decision.
CONCLUSION: This is the first study aimed at identifying factors associated with DNR decisions in a Portuguese hospital with an organized emergency system. DNR decisions were taken in 33% of cases of cardiac arrest. Advanced age, cancer, and no measures initiated before arrival of the MET were associated with the DNR decision. These findings need to be confirmed in larger studies and should be taken into account when taking DNR decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19438149

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Port Cardiol        ISSN: 0870-2551            Impact factor:   1.374


  5 in total

Review 1.  How long is long enough, and have we done everything we should?--Ethics of calling codes.

Authors:  Primi-Ashley Ranola; Raina M Merchant; Sarah M Perman; Abigail M Khan; David Gaieski; Arthur L Caplan; James N Kirkpatrick
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Do-not-resuscitate orders and related factors among family surrogates of patients in the emergency department.

Authors:  Ya-Hui Cheng; Jing-Jy Wang; Kuan-Han Wu; Shan Huang; Mei- Ling Kuo; Chao-Hui Su
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.359

Review 3.  End of Life Care and Do Not Resuscitate Orders: How Much Does Age Influence Decision Making? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ifor Cook; Aimee L Kirkup; Lauren J Langham; Muminah A Malik; Gabriella Marlow; Ian Sammy
Journal:  Gerontol Geriatr Med       Date:  2017-06-12

4.  Failure to activate the in-hospital emergency team: causes and outcomes.

Authors:  Vera Barbosa; Ernestina Gomes; Senio Vaz; Gustavo Azevedo; Gonçalo Fernandes; Amélia Ferreira; Rui Araujo
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

Review 5.  Association between diabetes mellitus and poor patient outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dinesh Chandra Voruganti; Adithya Chennamadhavuni; Rohan Garje; Ghanshyam Palamaner Subash Shantha; Marin L Schweizer; Saket Girotra; Michael Giudici
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-18       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.