Literature DB >> 19437936

Implementing an electronic medical record at a residency site: physicians' perceived effects on quality of care, documentation, and productivity.

Gregory L Brotzman1, Clare E Guse, David L Fay, Kenneth G Schellhase, Anne M Marbella.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) are quickly becoming a standard component of medical practices.
OBJECTIVES: We longitudinally studied the impact of EMR implementation on physician perceptions of quality of care, documentation, and work hours, as well as on measured physician productivity.
METHODS: Physicians were surveyed at 3-month intervals regarding perceived impact of the EMR on quality of care, documentation, and productivity. Relative Value Units (RVUs) per clinic hours were used to measure productivity. Paired t-tests were used to compare the mean RVUs per clinic hour in the pre-EMR with the immediate post-EMR time period and the long-term post-EMR time period.
RESULTS: RVUs per hour increased significantly from the pre-EMR time period to the immediate post-EMR time period (means 1.49 and 1.82, respectively, P = 0.0007). The long-term post-EMR time period also showed a significant increase over the pre-EMR period (mean 1.79, P = 0.007). Sixty-six percent of physicians perceived that EMR implementation increased their work amount a little or much more.
CONCLUSION: Not only did physician production rise immediately, it stayed at the increased level for the duration of our study period. This may be due to improved documentation supporting more appropriate billing. However, physicians also perceived the EMR as taking up more of their time.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19437936

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  WMJ        ISSN: 1098-1861


  6 in total

1.  Evaluation of Documentation Patterns of Trainees and Supervising Physicians Using Data Mining.

Authors:  Ramesh Madhavan; Chi Tang; Pratik Bhattacharya; Fadi Delly; Maysaa M Basha
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2014-09

2.  Evaluation of electronic health record implementation in ophthalmology at an academic medical center (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Michael F Chiang; Sarah Read-Brown; Daniel C Tu; Dongseok Choi; David S Sanders; Thomas S Hwang; Steven Bailey; Daniel J Karr; Elizabeth Cottle; John C Morrison; David J Wilson; Thomas R Yackel
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2013-09

3.  Two-year longitudinal assessment of physicians' perceptions after replacement of a longstanding homegrown electronic health record: does a J-curve of satisfaction really exist?

Authors:  David A Hanauer; Greta L Branford; Grant Greenberg; Sharon Kileny; Mick P Couper; Kai Zheng; Sung W Choi
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  National Trends in Primary Care Visit Use and Practice Capabilities, 2008-2015.

Authors:  Aarti Rao; Zhuo Shi; Kristin N Ray; Ateev Mehrotra; Ishani Ganguli
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.166

5.  Why Residency Programs Should Not Ignore the Electronic Heath Record after Adoption.

Authors:  Conrad Krawiec
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2019-10-01

6.  Implementation of electronic charting is not associated with significant change in physician productivity in an academic emergency department.

Authors:  Dusadee Sarangarm; Gregory Lamb; Steven Weiss; Amy Ernst; Lorraine Hewitt
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2018-06-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.