Literature DB >> 19436438

Where have all the midwives gone?

Phyllis L Brodsky1.   

Abstract

In past centuries, only women attended women in childbirth. Birthing women were in control, choosing who should attend them and where and how to give birth. Men were usually excluded unless they were needed for their strength and their tools if labor was obstructed. Eventually, with the medicalization of childbirth, male physicians became involved, introducing new techniques that interfered with the normal birth process and competed with midwives. By the 19th century, midwives struggled to hold onto their profession and advance through education. Midwives survived in Europe, but in America, they were eventually usurped in the early 20th century when birth began taking place in hospitals and as medical science and technology advanced. Midwives eventually rose again as educated nurse-midwives. Technology and obstetric interventions in normal childbirth continue, in spite of lack of evidence of their efficacy. Midwives are again in jeopardy because of rising malpractice insurance costs, women's trust in technology, and, most recently, renewed efforts by physicians to once again prevent midwives from practicing autonomously and outside the hospital environment in the United States.

Entities:  

Keywords:  midwives; normal childbirth; obstetric interventions

Year:  2008        PMID: 19436438      PMCID: PMC2582410          DOI: 10.1624/105812408X324912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Perinat Educ        ISSN: 1058-1243


  9 in total

Review 1.  Epidural versus non-epidural analgesia for pain relief in labour.

Authors:  C J Howell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2000

2.  Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America.

Authors:  Kenneth C Johnson; Betty-Anne Daviss
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-06-18

3.  Obstetrics through the ages.

Authors:  L TOWNSEND
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1952-04-26       Impact factor: 7.738

4.  Intrapartum fetal monitoring--a disappointing story.

Authors:  R Freeman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1990-03-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  A model of exemplary midwifery practice: results of a Delphi study.

Authors:  H P Kennedy
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.388

Review 6.  The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Barbara L Leighton; Stephen H Halpern
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 7.  A meta-analysis of upright positions in the second stage to reduce instrumental deliveries in women with epidural analgesia.

Authors:  Christine L Roberts; Charles S Algert; Carolyn A Cameron; Siranda Torvaldsen
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  Listening to Mothers II: Report of the Second National U.S. Survey of Women's Childbearing Experiences: Conducted January-February 2006 for Childbirth Connection by Harris Interactive(R) in partnership with Lamaze International.

Authors:  Eugene R Declercq; Carol Sakala; Maureen P Corry; Sandra Applebaum
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2007

Review 9.  WITHDRAWN: Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor.

Authors:  S B Thacker; D Stroup; M Chang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Stress among Care Givers: The Impact of Nursing a Relative with Cancer.

Authors:  Priyadarshini Kulkarni; Pradeep Kulkarni; Ravindra Ghooi; Madhura Bhatwadekar; Nandini Thatte; Vrushali Anavkar
Journal:  Indian J Palliat Care       Date:  2014-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.