Literature DB >> 19436169

Methods of running gait analysis.

Brian K Higginson1.   

Abstract

The continued increase in running popularity has led to a subsequent increase in the need to assess running gait more easily and affordably. Although traditional measurement devices such as motion capture systems, force plates, and electromyography are adequate methods of gait analysis, they suffer from several limitations, such as expense and lack of portability. Recent technological advances have made available more viable options such as accelerometers, electrogoniometers, gyroscopes, and in-shoe pressure sensors. These sensors are being used more commonly to acquire the same information as the more traditional systems, without the associated limitations. Combined with wireless technology and/or data loggers, they provide an affordable, lightweight alternative to gait analysis, allowing data collection over prolonged periods of time in almost any environment. This article will review the current technologies used in the analysis of running gait, with a focus upon the latest developments and equipment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19436169     DOI: 10.1249/JSR.0b013e3181a6187a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Sports Med Rep        ISSN: 1537-890X            Impact factor:   1.733


  9 in total

Review 1.  Trends Supporting the In-Field Use of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Sport Performance Evaluation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Valentina Camomilla; Elena Bergamini; Silvia Fantozzi; Giuseppe Vannozzi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.576

2.  Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rachel Mason; Liam T Pearson; Gillian Barry; Fraser Young; Oisin Lennon; Alan Godfrey; Samuel Stuart
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-10-15       Impact factor: 11.928

3.  Clinical Indoor Running Gait Analysis May Not Approximate Outdoor Running Gait Based on Novel Drone Technology.

Authors:  Lindsay Lafferty; John Wawrzyniak; Morgan Chambers; Todd Pagliarulo; Arthur Berg; Nour Hawila; Matthew Silvis
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-11-10       Impact factor: 4.355

Review 4.  Common leg injuries of long-distance runners: anatomical and biomechanical approach.

Authors:  Robert A Gallo; Michael Plakke; Matthew L Silvis
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.843

5.  MC sensor--a novel method for measurement of muscle tension.

Authors:  Srđan Đorđević; Sara Stančin; Andrej Meglič; Veljko Milutinović; Sašo Tomažič
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Reproducibility of the Evolution of Stride Biomechanics During Exhaustive Runs.

Authors:  Géraldine Martens; Dorian Deflandre; Cédric Schwartz; Nadia Dardenne; Thierry Bury
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.193

Review 7.  Modeling Complex Orthopedic Trauma in Rodents: Bone, Muscle and Nerve Injury and Healing.

Authors:  Huaishuang Shen; Aysha M Gardner; Juhee Vyas; Ryosuke Ishida; Vivianne L Tawfik
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.810

8.  Inertial Sensor Estimation of Initial and Terminal Contact during In-Field Running.

Authors:  Yue Yang; Li Wang; Steven Su; Mark Watsford; Lauren Marie Wood; Rob Duffield
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Examination of a foot mounted IMU-based methodology for a running gait assessment.

Authors:  Fraser Young; Rachel Mason; Conor Wall; Rosie Morris; Samuel Stuart; Alan Godfrey
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-09-06
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.